Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cathedral City

Tract 06065044933 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,525 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 06065044933 belongs to the Royal Palms area of Cathedral City, California. It is home to 3,525 residents and scores 5.9/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 73% of US census tracts.

45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,605 a month while the average household earns $61,563 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 76% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 42% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units1,005
Renter share75.9%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate11.2%
Median income$61,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Royal Palms
Very Low
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 16 tracts In Cathedral City
Elevated
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#174 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Elevated
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#4,126 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cathedral City and the region

Centroid at 33.8123, -116.4625 · click any tract to drill in

Why Royal Palms scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.2% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,605 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cathedral City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cathedral City
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.3

How Royal Palms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Royal Palms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 044933Cathedral City: 7.87.8Cathedral Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Royal Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Royal Palms

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cathedral City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 29.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065044933

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044933?

Census tract 06065044933 in the Royal Palms neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065044933?

Median gross rent is $1,605/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044933?

11.2% of residents in tract 06065044933 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,525.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044933?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 69th, minority 93th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 06065044933 considered part of Royal Palms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044933 fall within Royal Palms (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065044933 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065044933 compare to Cathedral City overall?

Tract 06065044933 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Cathedral City at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cathedral City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cathedral City

Top eight tracts in Cathedral City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related