Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Cragmor Eviction Risk: Moderate , Colorado Springs

Tract 08041000301 · El Paso County, CO · pop 3,244 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

In the Cragmor area of Colorado Springs, census tract 08041000301 scores 5.8/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 69% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 66% of renter households, a severe level, and 46% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,254 a month while the average household earns $73,821 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 12% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,305
Renter share34.8%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate20.2%
Median income$73,821

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Cragmor
High
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#22 of 116 tracts In Colorado Springs
High
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 167 tracts In El Paso County
High
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#446 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Colorado Springs and the region

Centroid at 38.8799, -104.8030 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cragmor scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Colorado Springs
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
20.2% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,254 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Colorado Springs
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Colorado Springs
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Colorado Springs
3.5

How Cragmor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cragmor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 000301Colorado Springs: 4.44.4Colorado Springsparent cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 69Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 6.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.6%Peak (2017)
  • 39Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cragmor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cragmor

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Colorado Springs eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the El Paso County average of 5.6 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 84th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 69 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 6.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.6% of renter households in 2017.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 08041000301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08041000301?

Census tract 08041000301 in the Cragmor neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08041000301?

Median gross rent is $1,254/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08041000301?

20.2% of residents in tract 08041000301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,244.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08041000301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 77th, minority 50th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 08041000301 considered part of Cragmor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08041000301 fall within Cragmor (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08041000301?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 69 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 08041000301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.70% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 08041000301 compare to Colorado Springs overall?

Tract 08041000301 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Colorado Springs at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Colorado Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Colorado Springs

Top eight tracts in Colorado Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related