Churchill Downs Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing
Tract 26065003601 · Ingham County, MI · pop 3,862 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi
Census tract 26065003601 covers the Churchill Downs area of Lansing, home to 3,862 residents. For landlords it grades 6.7/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 81% of renter households, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,260 monthly, set against $58,152 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 19% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.6904, -84.5971 · click any tract to drill in
Why Churchill Downs scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Churchill Downs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 81%Household composition
- 79%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Churchill Downs. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.8%Housing insecurity
- 17.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.5%Food insecurity
- 30.8%SNAP enrollment
- 14.8%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 19.9%Frequent mental distress
- 38.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Churchill Downs
The heaviest input here is economic stress at 7.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 26065003601
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065003601?
What is the average rent in tract 26065003601?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065003601?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065003601?
Is tract 26065003601 considered part of Churchill Downs?
What share of households in tract 26065003601 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065003601 compare to Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065003601 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.