Country Club Terrace Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109002800 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 5,192 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 31109002800 covers part of the Country Club Terrace area of Lincoln, NE, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,192 residents. Against Lancaster County at 43.9%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.7767, -96.6952 · click any tract to drill in
Why Country Club Terrace scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Country Club Terrace compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 51%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 20%Grade A
- 14%Grade B
- 15%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 445Total filings over 14 yrs
- 3.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.6%Peak (2013)
- 20Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 13.1%Frequent mental distress
- 21.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Country Club Terrace
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.1/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Food insecurity runs 7.7% against 17.8% nationally.
At $913 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Lincoln commands. The filing record is not thin: 445 evictions over 14 years of observation. Against the Lancaster County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.
Housing insecurity runs 7.0% against 14.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2013, when 5.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 3.8% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $87,000, annual rent is just 13%.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 31109002800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109002800?
What is the average rent in tract 31109002800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109002800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109002800?
Is tract 31109002800 considered part of Country Club Terrace?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109002800?
What share of households in tract 31109002800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109002800 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109002800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.