Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Radburn Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fair Lawn
Tract 34003022200 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 7,983 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
34003022200 is a census tract in the Radburn area of Glen Rock, NJ. It scores 4.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 7,983 residents. The severe-burden share is 67%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,355
Renter share5.4%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$217,404
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
34
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fair Lawn and the region
Centroid at 40.9571, -74.1242 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radburn scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fair Lawn
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fair Lawn
9.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fair Lawn
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fair Lawn
5.7
How Radburn compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 43%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 42%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 27Total filings over 5 yrs
- 5.96%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.0%Peak (2013)
- 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 78% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radburn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.4%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.1%Food insecurity
- 2.4%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 4.6%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 16.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radburn
87% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Bergen County average of 46.6%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.4/10.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 16.0% against 31.5% nationally.
It sits 1.4 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. Housing insecurity runs 5.4% against 14.2% nationally.
Court records carry 27 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Filings peaked in 2013 at 10.0% of renter households.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.0% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 2.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003022200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003022200?
Census tract 34003022200 in the Radburn neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003022200?
1.5% of residents in tract 34003022200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,983.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003022200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 30th, minority 43th, housing 43th.
Q4
Is tract 34003022200 considered part of Radburn?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003022200 fall within Radburn (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003022200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34003022200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.96% of renter households, peaking at 10.0% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34003022200 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34003022200 compare to Fair Lawn overall?
Tract 34003022200 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Fair Lawn at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fair Lawn eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34003022200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fair Lawn
Top eight tracts in Fair Lawn ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related