Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally
The Shades Eviction Risk: Elevated , Union City
Tract 34017017300 · Hudson County, NJ · pop 2,316 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
With a score of 7.1/10, tract 34017017300 in the The Shades area of Union City, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%
Stable renters 43%
Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units1,020
Renter share68.2%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$81,962
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
12
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
36
th percentile
Low
Within state
71
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Union City and the region
Centroid at 40.7612, -74.0312 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Shades scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Union City
7.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,621 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union City
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union City
5.1
How The Shades compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 74%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 79%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 77%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 377Total filings over 4 yrs
- 14.00%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.7%Peak (2014)
- 77Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 51% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within The Shades. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.8%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.5%Food insecurity
- 10.4%SNAP enrollment
- 9.1%Transit barriers
- 18.5%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Shades
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.3/10. Cost burden runs 37% here against 46.5% across Hudson County.
This is renter territory: 68% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.1/10.
On the high side, local political climate reads 7.6/10. The filing record is not thin: 377 evictions over 4 years of observation.
Adults with no health insurance runs 18.5% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Hudson County average of 7.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 23.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 14.0% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #12,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.3/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34017017300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34017017300?
Census tract 34017017300 in the The Shades neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34017017300?
Median gross rent is $1,621/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34017017300?
16.2% of residents in tract 34017017300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,316.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34017017300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 82th, minority 79th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 34017017300 considered part of The Shades?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34017017300 fall within The Shades (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34017017300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 377 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34017017300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.00% of renter households, peaking at 23.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34017017300 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34017017300 compare to Union City overall?
Tract 34017017300 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Union City at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34017017300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Union City
Top eight tracts in Union City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NJ
Lincoln Harbor
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
8.2
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
The Shades
7.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Lincoln Harbor
7.9
/ 10 · High
Related