Park Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Roselle
Tract 34039033900 · Union County, NJ · pop 3,312 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 34039033900 sits in the Park Village area of Roselle eviction risk Park, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.6/10. It is home to 3,312 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.9/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Roselle and the region
Centroid at 40.6628, -74.2681 · click any tract to drill in
Why Park Village scores 6.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Park Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 75%Socioeconomic
- 53%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 6%Grade B
- 54%Grade C
- 6%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 135Total filings over 4 yrs
- 5.17%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.2%Peak (2018)
- 39Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Park Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.3%Housing insecurity
- 8.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.9%Food insecurity
- 9.7%SNAP enrollment
- 9.0%Transit barriers
- 16.3%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 24.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Park Village
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.2/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
The filing record is not thin: 135 evictions over 4 years of observation. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.9/10. 41% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Union County average of 44.6%.
Filings peaked in 2018 at 6.2% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.2% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 82nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Union County average of 6.6 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,699, close to the Roselle Park average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $104,444.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34039033900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039033900?
What is the average rent in tract 34039033900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039033900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039033900?
Is tract 34039033900 considered part of Park Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039033900?
What share of households in tract 34039033900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34039033900 compare to Roselle overall?
Was tract 34039033900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Roselle
Top eight tracts in Roselle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.