Park Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Roselle
Tract 34039037200 · Union County, NJ · pop 4,237 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 34039037200 sits in the Park Village area of Cranford, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. Population here is 4,237. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Roselle and the region
Centroid at 40.6550, -74.2976 · click any tract to drill in
Why Park Village scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Park Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 30%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 15%Grade B
- 48%Grade C
- 10%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 32Total filings over 4 yrs
- 0.83%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.4%Peak (2013)
- 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Park Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.2%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 13.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Park Village
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.3/10. 13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
SNAP participation runs 4.5% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 32 evictions over 4 years of observation. Average gross rent is $2,186, 11% below the Cranford average.
Filings peaked in 2013 at 1.4% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Union Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 0.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #16,032 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
43% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34039037200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039037200?
What is the average rent in tract 34039037200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039037200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039037200?
Is tract 34039037200 considered part of Park Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039037200?
What share of households in tract 34039037200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34039037200 compare to Roselle overall?
Was tract 34039037200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Roselle
Top eight tracts in Roselle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.