Park Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Roselle
Tract 34039037200 · Union County, NJ · pop 4,237 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 34039037200 covers the Park Village area of Roselle, home to 4,237 residents. For landlords it grades 6.7/10, an elevated reading. It lands near the 90th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,186 a month against an average household income of $102,774 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Roselle and the region
Centroid at 40.6550, -74.2976 · click any tract to drill in
Why Park Village scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Park Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 30%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 15%Grade B
- 48%Grade C
- 10%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 32Total filings over 4 yrs
- 0.83%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.4%Peak (2013)
- 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Park Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.2%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 13.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Park Village
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Roselle eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Union County average of 6.6 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 48th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Part of this tract, about 10% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34039037200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039037200?
What is the average rent in tract 34039037200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039037200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039037200?
Is tract 34039037200 considered part of Park Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039037200?
What share of households in tract 34039037200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34039037200 compare to Roselle overall?
Was tract 34039037200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Roselle
Top eight tracts in Roselle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.