Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Park Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Roselle

Tract 34039036100 · Union County, NJ · pop 1,518 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 34039036100 sits in Park Village in Roselle eviction risk, New Jersey eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. That is riskier than roughly 64% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

26% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,088 a month while the average household earns $62,275 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 75% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 56% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units769
Renter share75.0%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$62,275

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 11 tracts In Park Village
High
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#62 of 120 tracts In Union County
Moderate
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#870 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
National
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#35,899 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Roselle and the region

Centroid at 40.6349, -74.2898 · click any tract to drill in

Why Park Village scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roselle
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,088 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roselle
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roselle
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roselle
5.0

How Park Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Park Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 036100Roselle: 7.97.9Roselleparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Park Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Park Village

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Roselle eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Union County average of 6.6 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 13th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 34039036100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039036100?

Census tract 34039036100 in the Park Village neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34039036100?

Median gross rent is $1,088/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34039036100?

7.2% of residents in tract 34039036100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,518.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34039036100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 16th, minority 25th, housing 5th.
Q5

Is tract 34039036100 considered part of Park Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34039036100 fall within Park Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 34039036100 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34039036100 compare to Roselle overall?

Tract 34039036100 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Roselle at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roselle eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34039036100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related