Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,132 of 84,120 nationally

Barnard Eviction Risk: Elevated , Rochester

Tract 36055013901 · Monroe County, NY · pop 4,328 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 6.2/10, tract 36055013901 in the Barnard area of Monroe County, NY reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,328. Severe burden reaches 40%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 7% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,681
Renter share20.8%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate7.4%
Median income$70,967

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Barnard
Very Low
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#119 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Moderate
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#3,823 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
National
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#17,132 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rochester and the region

Centroid at 43.2226, -77.6508 · click any tract to drill in

Why Barnard scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
7.4% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,619 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
5.0

How Barnard compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Barnard risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.2This tracttract 0139018.1Rochesterparent city7.2Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Barnard. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Barnard

Cost burden runs 65% here against 46.4% across Monroe County. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.8/10.

On the high side, state political climate reads 7.3/10. Against the Monroe County average of 7.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.3/10. The voucher gap is 13.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 80th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055013901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055013901?

Census tract 36055013901 in the Barnard neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055013901?

Median gross rent is $1,619/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055013901?

7.4% of residents in tract 36055013901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,328.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055013901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 70th, minority 48th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 36055013901 considered part of Barnard?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055013901 fall within Barnard (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055013901 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055013901 compare to Rochester overall?

Tract 36055013901 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055013901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related