Tract 36055013902 ·
Monroe County, NY · pop 4,451 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 36055013902 covers part of the Barnard area of Monroe County, NY, and scores 7.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,451. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.6/10.
Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30%Stable renters 36%Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units2,084
Renter share65.7%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate26.2%
Median income$57,588
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75th percentile
#2 of 5 tracts In Barnard
High
Within county
60th percentile
#84 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Elevated
Within state
44th percentile
#3,036 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Moderate
National
90th percentile
#8,653 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rochester and the region
Centroid at 43.2099, -77.6526 · click any tract to drill in
Why Barnard scores 7.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
26.2% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$939 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
5.0
How Barnard compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 85
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
72%Socioeconomic
79%Household composition
72%Racial/ethnic minority
87%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
16%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.1%Housing insecurity
14.1%Utility-shutoff threat
25.5%Food insecurity
26.6%SNAP enrollment
13.6%Transit barriers
9.7%No health insurance
19.1%Frequent mental distress
33.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Barnard
20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. 66% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
SNAP participation runs 26.6% against 15.2% nationally. Running hot, state political climate reads 7.3/10.
On the high side, local political climate reads 7.3/10. Food insecurity runs 25.5% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Monroe County average of 7.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 90th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 8.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 36055013902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055013902?
Census tract 36055013902 in the Barnard neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36055013902?
Median gross rent is $939/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36055013902?
26.2% of residents in tract 36055013902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,451.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36055013902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 79th, minority 72th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 36055013902 considered part of Barnard?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055013902 fall within Barnard (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 36055013902 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 36055013902 compare to Rochester overall?
Tract 36055013902 scores 7.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Rochester at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 36055013902 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.