Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Eno Trace Eviction Risk: Moderate , Durham

Tract 37063001708 · Durham County, NC · pop 4,947 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 37063001708 sits in the Eno Trace area of Durham eviction risk, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. It is home to 4,947 residents. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 29% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,077
Renter share45.2%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$67,453

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Eno Trace
Moderate
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 70 tracts In Durham
Elevated
Within county
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 68 tracts In Durham County
Elevated
Within state
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#1,127 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Durham and the region

Centroid at 36.0699, -78.8885 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eno Trace scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Durham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,417 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Durham
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Durham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Durham
4.5

How Eno Trace compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eno Trace risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 001708Durham: 4.04.0Durhamparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,157Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 37.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 49.2%Peak (2011)
  • 125Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370630017082005: 183 filings (42.76/100 renter HHs)2006: 222 filings (51.87/100 renter HHs)2009: 173 filings (40.42/100 renter HHs)2010: 192 filings (38.40/100 renter HHs)2011: 283 filings (49.22/100 renter HHs)2012: 211 filings (36.70/100 renter HHs)2013: 226 filings (39.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 232 filings (40.35/100 renter HHs)2015: 169 filings (29.39/100 renter HHs)2016: 141 filings (25.18/100 renter HHs)2017: 125 filings (22.32/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 32% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eno Trace

Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. Cost burden runs 35% here against 43.8% across Durham County.

Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Court records carry 2,157 eviction filings across 11 observed years. The worst year on record was 2011, when 49.2% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 37.8% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.1/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the Durham County average of 4.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,417, close to the Durham average. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $67,453.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 37063001708

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37063001708?

Census tract 37063001708 in the Eno Trace neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37063001708?

Median gross rent is $1,417/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37063001708?

8.8% of residents in tract 37063001708 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,947.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37063001708?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 87th, minority 89th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 37063001708 considered part of Eno Trace?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37063001708 fall within Eno Trace (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37063001708?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,157 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 37063001708 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 37.81% of renter households, peaking at 49.2% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37063001708 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37063001708 compare to Durham overall?

Tract 37063001708 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Durham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Durham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Durham

Top eight tracts in Durham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related