Holloway Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Durham

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. SNAP participation runs 37.2% against 15.2% nationally.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. 75% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Housing insecurity runs 27.8% against 14.2% nationally. 17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. It sits 1.3 points above the Durham County average of 4.1. The filing record is not thin: 3,792 evictions over 11 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2005 at 65.4% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Durham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 35.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #24,859 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.