Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Vermont Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051006601 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,754 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Here is how census tract 41051006601, in Vermont Hills in Portland eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.9/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 2,754. That is riskier than about 93% of US census tracts.

60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,922 a month while the average household earns $115,375 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 8% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,236
Renter share19.8%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$115,375

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Vermont Hills
Elevated
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#145 of 168 tracts In Portland
Very Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#156 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#582 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.4719, -122.7334 · click any tract to drill in

Why Vermont Hills scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,922 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Vermont Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Vermont Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 006601Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 72Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 2.16%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2009)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510066012000: 2 filings (1.09/100 renter HHs)2001: 3 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2002: 5 filings (2.73/100 renter HHs)2003: 6 filings (3.28/100 renter HHs)2004: 2 filings (1.09/100 renter HHs)2005: 10 filings (4.59/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (1.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (1.83/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (0.92/100 renter HHs)2009: 12 filings (5.50/100 renter HHs)2010: 8 filings (3.09/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (2.36/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.35/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (1.01/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.46/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 12Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Vermont Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Vermont Hills

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 72 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 2.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.5% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051006601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051006601?

Census tract 41051006601 in the Vermont Hills neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051006601?

Median gross rent is $1,922/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051006601?

2.3% of residents in tract 41051006601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,754.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051006601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 6th, minority 21th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 41051006601 considered part of Vermont Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051006601 fall within Vermont Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051006601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 72 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 41051006601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.16% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 41051006601 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051006601 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related