Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

The Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113007914 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,876 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

48113007914 is a census tract in the The Village area of Dallas, TX. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,876 residents. This is renter territory: 89% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 47% Owners 10%
Tract context
Occupied units2,197
Renter share89.3%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate28.8%
Median income$70,730

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 13 tracts In The Village
Very High
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#62 of 348 tracts In Dallas
High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8422, -96.7695 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Village scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
28.8% poverty · this tract
7.2
Supply constraint
$1,960 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How The Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 007914Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 542Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 2.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.9%Peak (2000)
  • 38Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130079142000: 46 filings (3.88/100 renter HHs)2001: 41 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)2002: 34 filings (2.87/100 renter HHs)2003: 35 filings (2.96/100 renter HHs)2004: 21 filings (1.77/100 renter HHs)2005: 26 filings (2.81/100 renter HHs)2006: 13 filings (1.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 12 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2008: 40 filings (4.32/100 renter HHs)2009: 21 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2010: 38 filings (3.45/100 renter HHs)2011: 23 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2012: 43 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2013: 32 filings (2.44/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2015: 24 filings (1.83/100 renter HHs)2016: 32 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2017: 38 filings (2.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 17% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 228Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (1.31× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (2.10× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Village

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Average gross rent is $1,960, 33% above the Dallas average. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $70,730, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. The poverty rate is 29%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 542 filings here across 18 tracked years.

The worst year on record was 2000, when 3.9% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 2.6% of renter households face a filing.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113007914

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113007914?

Census tract 48113007914 in the The Village neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113007914?

Median gross rent is $1,960/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113007914?

28.8% of residents in tract 48113007914 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,876.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113007914?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 1th, minority 65th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 48113007914 considered part of The Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113007914 fall within The Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113007914?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 542 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113007914 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.59% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113007914 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113007914 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113007914 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48113007914 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related