Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Bonton Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113021100 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,652 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 48113021100 covers part of the Bonton area of Dallas, TX, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,652. Cost burden runs roughly two in three here against 47.9% across Dallas County.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 18% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,763
Renter share50.3%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate45.3%
Median income$26,522

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Bonton
Very Low
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7357, -96.7725 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bonton scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
45.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,070 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Bonton compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bonton risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 021100Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 500Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-02-01: 15 filings (1.96× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (0.58× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (0.68× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 8 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-01-01: 16 filings (1.55× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-04-01: 16 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-06-01: 11 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-09-01: 17 filings (1.59× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.39× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-05-01: 11 filings (1.27× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-12-01: 13 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (1.17× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-09-01: 11 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-10-01: 17 filings (1.76× baseline)2024-11-01: 24 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 24 filings (2.32× baseline)2025-02-01: 16 filings (2.09× baseline)2025-03-01: 10 filings (1.30× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bonton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bonton

What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10. 35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 45%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Set annual rent against average income of $26,522 and the ratio lands at 48%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Adults with no health insurance runs 33.4% against 11.3% nationally.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. Average gross rent is $1,070, 27% below the Dallas average.

Disability prevalence runs 44.7% against 31.5% nationally. It sits 1.3 points above the Dallas County average of 3.8. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113021100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113021100?

Census tract 48113021100 in the Bonton neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113021100?

Median gross rent is $1,070/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113021100?

45.3% of residents in tract 48113021100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,652.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113021100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 97th, minority 97th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 48113021100 considered part of Bonton?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113021100 fall within Bonton (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113021100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113021100 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113021100 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113021100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related