Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Bowling Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Pasadena

Tract 48201342400 · Harris, TX · pop 3,599 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

The Bowling Green neighborhood of Pasadena anchors census tract 48201342400, which lands at 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 17% of US census tracts.

37% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $991 monthly, set against $76,488 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 33% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,318
Renter share52.1%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$76,488

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Bowling Green
Elevated
Within parent city
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 32 tracts In Pasadena
Very Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#752 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Low
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#3,702 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pasadena and the region

Centroid at 29.6958, -95.1477 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bowling Green scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$991 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
2.5

How Bowling Green compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bowling Green risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 342400Pasadena: 2.72.7Pasadenaparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 249Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 6.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.0%Peak (2013)
  • 36Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013424002009: 27 filings (5.25/100 renter HHs)2010: 19 filings (4.19/100 renter HHs)2011: 36 filings (6.75/100 renter HHs)2012: 47 filings (8.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 48 filings (9.01/100 renter HHs)2014: 36 filings (6.75/100 renter HHs)2015: 36 filings (6.75/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 33% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 716Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.84×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2020-09-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 8 filings (2.13× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2021-10-01: 17 filings (5.23× baseline)2021-11-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 13 filings (2.26× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (5.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (3.60× baseline)2022-07-01: 23 filings (9.20× baseline)2022-08-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2022-09-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2022-11-01: 13 filings (3.47× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 15 filings (6.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 14 filings (5.60× baseline)2023-08-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 15 filings (4.62× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (3.14× baseline)2024-01-01: 14 filings (2.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 19 filings (8.44× baseline)2024-03-01: 11 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 13 filings (3.25× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (2.13× baseline)2024-06-01: 11 filings (4.40× baseline)2024-07-01: 16 filings (6.40× baseline)2024-08-01: 24 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 8 filings (2.46× baseline)2024-11-01: 19 filings (5.07× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-01-01: 18 filings (3.13× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (5.78× baseline)2025-03-01: 16 filings (5.82× baseline)2025-04-01: 13 filings (3.25× baseline)2025-05-01: 20 filings (5.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 20 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 18 filings (7.20× baseline)2025-08-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 12 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2025-11-01: 10 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (2.86× baseline)2026-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bowling Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bowling Green

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Harris County average of 5.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 249 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 6.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.0% of renter households in 2013.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 2.84x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201342400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201342400?

Census tract 48201342400 in the Bowling Green neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201342400?

Median gross rent is $991/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201342400?

7.3% of residents in tract 48201342400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,599.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201342400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 65th, minority 85th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 48201342400 considered part of Bowling Green?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201342400 fall within Bowling Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201342400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 249 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201342400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.79% of renter households, peaking at 9.0% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201342400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.84× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201342400 compare to Pasadena overall?

Tract 48201342400 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Pasadena at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena

Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related