Within parent city
56
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
Bountiful Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011126406 · Davis, UT · pop 4,332 · 42% of tract blocks fall in Bountiful
With a score of 3.9/10, tract 49011126406 in Bountiful in Davis County ranks in the Lower tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,332 residents. That is riskier than roughly 10% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
28% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,524 monthly, set against $96,910 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 32%
Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,655
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.30
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$96,910
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
59
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
National
9
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bountiful and the region
Centroid at 40.8496, -111.8973 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bountiful scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,524 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bountiful
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bountiful
4.8
How Bountiful compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 30
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 48Total filings over 7 yrs
- 1.48%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.1%Peak (2009)
- 9Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 29% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.6%Food insecurity
- 5.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 8.7%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 27.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bountiful
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 48 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 1.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.1% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011126406
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126406?
Census tract 49011126406 in Bountiful scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011126406?
Median gross rent is $1,524/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126406?
3.1% of residents in tract 49011126406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,332.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126406?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 30th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 66th, minority 33th, housing 14th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126406?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 48 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126406 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.48% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49011126406 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49011126406 compare to Bountiful overall?
Tract 49011126406 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Bountiful at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bountiful
Top eight tracts in Bountiful ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
49011126902
2.9
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126600
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126901
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126700
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126500
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126801
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126802
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126402
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Related