Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally
Enchanted Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Cottonwood Heights
Tract 49035111302 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 6,077 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 49035111302, home to 6,077 residents in the Enchanted Hills neighborhood of Cottonwood Heights, scores 4.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
26% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,469 a month against an average household income of $127,056 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 17% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units2,123
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$127,056
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
43
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
26
th percentile
Low
Within state
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cottonwood Heights and the region
Centroid at 40.6156, -111.8033 · click any tract to drill in
Why Enchanted Hills scores 1.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,469 rent vs county FMR
9.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
4.0
How Enchanted Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 38Total filings over 9 yrs
- 1.30%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.3%Peak (2009)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 75% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Enchanted Hills
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cottonwood Heights eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Salt Lake County average of 4.4 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 38 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 1.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.3% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49035111302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035111302?
Census tract 49035111302 in the Enchanted Hills neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49035111302?
Median gross rent is $2,469/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035111302?
8.2% of residents in tract 49035111302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,077.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035111302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 6th, minority 19th, housing 1th.
Q5
Is tract 49035111302 considered part of Enchanted Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035111302 fall within Enchanted Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035111302?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 38 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035111302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.30% of renter households, peaking at 2.3% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49035111302 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49035111302 compare to Cottonwood Heights overall?
Tract 49035111302 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Cottonwood Heights at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cottonwood Heights eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cottonwood Heights
Top eight tracts in Cottonwood Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
Shady Grove
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Pondoray Park
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Cottonwood Ridge
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Towne and Country Village
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Scottish Heights
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Fyandale
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Top of the World
1.3
/ 10 · Very Low
Related