Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Fyandale Eviction Risk: Lower , Cottonwood Heights

Tract 49035111305 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,372 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 49035111305 sits in the Fyandale area of Cottonwood Heights eviction risk, UT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 4,372 residents. Cost burden runs about one in five here against 42.4% across Salt Lake County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 12% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,416
Renter share14.6%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$140,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fyandale
Moderate
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Cottonwood Heights
Very Low
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#162 of 251 tracts In Salt Lake
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cottonwood Heights and the region

Centroid at 40.6185, -111.8243 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fyandale scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,429 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
4.0

How Fyandale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fyandale risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 1113053.4Cottonwood Heightsparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 45Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 1.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.9%Peak (2011)
  • 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49035111305
Filings climbed 67% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fyandale

The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.5/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.9/10. SNAP participation runs 4.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Average gross rent is $1,429, 17% below the Cottonwood Heights average. Food insecurity runs 8.9% against 17.8% nationally.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 45 filings here across 9 tracked years. Against the Salt Lake County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.

Filings peaked in 2011 at 3.9% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.0% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 49035111305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035111305?

Census tract 49035111305 in the Fyandale neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49035111305?

Median gross rent is $1,429/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49035111305?

7.8% of residents in tract 49035111305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,372.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49035111305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 67th, minority 20th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 49035111305 considered part of Fyandale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035111305 fall within Fyandale (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035111305?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 45 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035111305 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.96% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49035111305 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49035111305 compare to Cottonwood Heights overall?

Tract 49035111305 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Cottonwood Heights at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cottonwood Heights eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cottonwood Heights

Top eight tracts in Cottonwood Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related