Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Fyandale Eviction Risk: Lower , Cottonwood Heights
Tract 49035111305 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,372 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
How risky is the Fyandale neighborhood of Cottonwood Heights for landlords? Census tract 49035111305 scores 3.7/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 7% of US census tracts.
19% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,429 a month against an average household income of $140,833 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,416
Renter share14.6%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$140,833
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
22
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cottonwood Heights and the region
Centroid at 40.6185, -111.8243 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fyandale scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,429 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cottonwood Heights
4.0
How Fyandale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 67%Household composition
- 20%Racial/ethnic minority
- 62%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 45Total filings over 9 yrs
- 1.96%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.9%Peak (2011)
- 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 67% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.9%Food insecurity
- 4.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 7.2%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 26.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fyandale
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 6.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cottonwood Heights eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Salt Lake County average of 4.4 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 45 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 2.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.9% of renter households in 2011.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49035111305
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035111305?
Census tract 49035111305 in the Fyandale neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49035111305?
Median gross rent is $1,429/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035111305?
7.8% of residents in tract 49035111305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,372.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035111305?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 67th, minority 20th, housing 62th.
Q5
Is tract 49035111305 considered part of Fyandale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035111305 fall within Fyandale (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035111305?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 45 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035111305 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.96% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49035111305 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49035111305 compare to Cottonwood Heights overall?
Tract 49035111305 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Cottonwood Heights at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cottonwood Heights eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cottonwood Heights
Top eight tracts in Cottonwood Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
Shady Grove
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Pondoray Park
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Cottonwood Ridge
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Towne and Country Village
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Enchanted Hills
1.6
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Scottish Heights
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Top of the World
1.3
/ 10 · Very Low
Related