Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,526 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma

Tract 53053063401 · Pierce County, WA · pop 5,004 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 53053063401 sits in the Larchmont neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 5,004 and an eviction-risk score of 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). 57% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 14% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,420/month against a median household income of $65,847 — roughly 26% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 18% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,881
Renter share42.7%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate11.0%
Median income$65,847

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
63 th percentile
Rank — 63th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 9 tracts In Larchmont
Elevated
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank — 55th percentileBottomTop
#23 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Elevated
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank — 78th percentileBottomTop
#44 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank — 93th percentileBottomTop
#127 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.1864, -122.4314 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 6.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
11.0% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,420 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larchmont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.16.1This tracttract 063401Tacoma: 7.47.4Tacomaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.25.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 104Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.76×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053063401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053063401?

Census tract 53053063401 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053063401?

Median gross rent is $1,420/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053063401?

11.0% of residents in tract 53053063401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,004.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053063401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 62th, minority 71th, housing 88th.

Q5

Is tract 53053063401 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053063401 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).

Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053063401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.76× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.

Q7

How does tract 53053063401 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053063401 scores 6.1/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q8

Was tract 53053063401 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related