Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally

Chattanooga Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 47065001900 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 3,617

Tract 47065001900 sits in Chattanooga eviction risk, TN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. It is home to 3,617 residents. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 42% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,622
Renter share74.1%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate42.2%
Median income$26,032

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 54 tracts In Chattanooga
High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 87 tracts In Hamilton County
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
High
National
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chattanooga and the region

Centroid at 35.0037, -85.3149 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chattanooga scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chattanooga
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
42.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$773 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chattanooga
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.0

How Chattanooga compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chattanooga risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.9This tracttract 0019003.5Chattanoogaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chattanooga

Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 42%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $773 a month, rents run 38% under what the rest of Chattanooga commands.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 49.9% against 31.5% nationally.

Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $26,032, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. 74% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Adults with no health insurance runs 21.5% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Hamilton County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.5/10.

Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 47065001900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065001900?

Census tract 47065001900 in Chattanooga scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47065001900?

Median gross rent is $773/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47065001900?

42.2% of residents in tract 47065001900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,617.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47065001900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 97th, minority 88th, housing 52th.
Q5

How does tract 47065001900 compare to Chattanooga overall?

Tract 47065001900 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Chattanooga at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chattanooga eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6

Was tract 47065001900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 7% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chattanooga

Top eight tracts in Chattanooga ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related