Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally

Chattanooga Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 47065010902 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 745 · 60% of tract blocks fall in Chattanooga

Census tract 47065010902 covers part of Chattanooga, TN, and scores 4.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 745. Against Hamilton County at 40.3%, about a quarter of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 27% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units339
Renter share36.0%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate28.9%
Median income$58,869

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 54 tracts In Chattanooga
High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 87 tracts In Hamilton County
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
High
National
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chattanooga and the region

Centroid at 35.0968, -85.3404 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chattanooga scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chattanooga
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
28.9% poverty · this tract
7.2
Supply constraint
$1,073 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chattanooga
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.0

How Chattanooga compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chattanooga risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.9This tracttract 0109023.5Chattanoogaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chattanooga

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

The poverty rate is 29%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10.

Against the Hamilton County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. At $1,073 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Chattanooga commands.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $58,869.

36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 47065010902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010902?

Census tract 47065010902 in Chattanooga scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47065010902?

Median gross rent is $1,073/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010902?

28.9% of residents in tract 47065010902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 745.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 35th, minority 40th, housing 67th.
Q5

How does tract 47065010902 compare to Chattanooga overall?

Tract 47065010902 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Chattanooga at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chattanooga eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6

Was tract 47065010902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chattanooga

Top eight tracts in Chattanooga ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related