Skip to content
Lantana, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 12,766 residents

Lantana, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Denton County · Population 12,766

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

20th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average1.8 Now2
2.4 1.4 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.0 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.8 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.6 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.6 2004 · score 1.5 2005 · score 1.5 2006 · score 1.5 2007 · score 1.4 2008 · score 1.7 2009 · score 1.8 2010 · score 1.9 2011 · score 1.9 2012 · score 1.7 2013 · score 1.7 2014 · score 1.6 2015 · score 1.6 2016 · score 1.9 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.4 2021 · score 2.3 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.0 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.1 Regional 5.1 State 1.5 Economic 3.2 Supply 6.2 Rent Control 2.4 Eviction 1.3 Tenant 2.4 Housing 2.1 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +13.2% (2024)
    5.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.1
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    1.3% poverty · 2.6% unemp.
    3.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $3,458 average · 6.2% renters
    6.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.6% of income on rent
    2.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    6.2% renters
    2.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lantana and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lantana compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Denton County
Very Low
#30 of 37 cities
Rank in county, 19th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 37 cities in Denton County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Very Low
#1540 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 16th percentileLowHigh
#1540 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lantana risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lantana: 2.02.0LantanaThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $3,458/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $952–$3,322 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 6.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 12,766 residents, 6.2% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.1 and 5.1 (GOP margin +13.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 2.1, rent-control risk 2.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.2. Supply constraint: 6.2. The numbers behind those: 1.3% poverty, 2.6% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lantana sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Plano, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.3 Plano Irving, TX · 26d · ~$2.4k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.4 Irving Garland, TX · 23d · ~$2.3k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.5 Garland Frisco, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.2 Frisco McKinney, TX · 27d · ~$2.5k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.3 McKinney Grand Prairie, TX · 24d · ~$2.4k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.5 Grand Prairie Denton, TX · 24d · ~$2.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 3 Denton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Lantana
Lantana · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lantana, TX

Landlording in Lantana, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lantana is a city of 12,766 residents where 6.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $3,458/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lantana eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lantana closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lantana's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lantana runs $952 to $3,322 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $3,458/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.4/10 in Lantana, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lantana: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,322 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lantana

Trap · 6.2%
6.2% renter share against 12,766 residents produces roughly 790 rental occupants in Lantana. Denton County voted R 8.1% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Lantana without going to court?

No. In Texas, you must go through the formal eviction process in court to legally remove a tenant from your property, even if they've violated the lease. Self-help evictions (like changing locks or shutting off utilities) are illegal and can lead to serious penalties.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after a judge rules for eviction?

After a judge issues a Judgment for Possession, the tenant typically has five calendar days to appeal the decision. If they don't appeal, or if the appeal is denied, you can then apply for a Writ of Possession. Once the Writ is issued, a constable or sheriff will post a 24-hour notice on the door before physically removing the tenant and their belongings.

Q3

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue as a reason not to pay rent?

Under Texas law (Texas tenant protections), tenants generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues unless they follow specific procedures, including giving you written notice of the defect, giving you a reasonable time to repair, and in some cases, having the repair certified. If they haven't followed the rules, their claim likely won't prevent an eviction for non-payment.

Q4

Can I charge late fees in Lantana?

Yes, you can charge reasonable late fees as outlined in your lease agreement. Texas law allows for late fees, but they must be reasonable and specified in the lease. They cannot be used as a penalty. Typically, a late fee of 10-12% of the monthly rent for a residential property is considered reasonable.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Lantana?

While you can represent yourself in Justice Court for a forcible detainer case, it's highly recommended to consult with or hire an attorney, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or you're unfamiliar with the process. A lawyer ensures all notices are correct, court procedures are followed, and your case is presented effectively, minimizing delays and potential legal missteps.

Q6

What's the best way to avoid evictions in Lantana?

The best defense is a good offense: thorough tenant screening, a crystal-clear and Texas-compliant lease agreement, and consistent communication with your tenants. Address issues proactively, respond to maintenance requests promptly, and be firm but fair when rent is late. Sometimes, a well-placed conversation or a "cash for keys" offer can prevent a costly, drawn-out court battle.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Lantana in the 20th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.