Fort Worth Eviction Risk: Lower

The voucher gap is 37.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.7/10. Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10.

The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Cost burden runs 46% here against 50.2% across Tarrant County. That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Tarrant County average of 3.8 closely. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $103,672.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.