Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Hurst Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113403 · Tarrant, TX · pop 2,830 · 85% of tract blocks fall in Hurst

Eviction risk in Hurst centers on tract 48439113403, which scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 2,830 residents. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,096 a month against an average household income of $74,167 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 8% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units956
Renter share15.4%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$74,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Hurst
Moderate
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#271 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#4,987 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hurst and the region

Centroid at 32.8301, -97.1945 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hurst scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hurst
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,096 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hurst
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hurst
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hurst
6.3

How Hurst compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hurst risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 113403Hurst: 2.22.2Hurstparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 233Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 7.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 30.7%Peak (2007)
  • 8Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391134032001: 15 filings (7.44/100 renter HHs)2002: 15 filings (7.44/100 renter HHs)2003: 17 filings (8.43/100 renter HHs)2004: 14 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)2005: 12 filings (7.66/100 renter HHs)2006: 26 filings (16.61/100 renter HHs)2007: 48 filings (30.66/100 renter HHs)2008: 10 filings (6.39/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (7.03/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (5.07/100 renter HHs)2011: 11 filings (6.43/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (4.09/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2015: 8 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2016: 6 filings (2.05/100 renter HHs)2017: 8 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 47% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 35Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hurst

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hurst, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.97x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113403?

Census tract 48439113403 in Hurst scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113403?

Median gross rent is $2,096/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113403?

6.8% of residents in tract 48439113403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,830.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 41th, minority 53th, housing 16th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113403?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 233 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113403 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.76% of renter households, peaking at 30.7% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113403 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113403 compare to Hurst overall?

Tract 48439113403 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of Hurst at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hurst; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hurst

Top eight tracts in Hurst ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related