Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Hurst Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113404 · Tarrant, TX · pop 5,871 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Hurst

Here is how census tract 48439113404, in Hurst, looks to a landlord: a 5.4/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 5,871. On the national scale it ranks #40,772 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 34% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,417 monthly, set against $64,534 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 25% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units2,175
Renter share38.6%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$64,534

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 9 tracts In Hurst
Elevated
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#218 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Moderate
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,444 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hurst and the region

Centroid at 32.8314, -97.1760 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hurst scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hurst
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,417 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hurst
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hurst
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hurst
6.3

How Hurst compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hurst risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 113404Hurst: 2.22.2Hurstparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,539Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 12.56%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.6%Peak (2013)
  • 101Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391134042001: 72 filings (10.14/100 renter HHs)2002: 75 filings (10.56/100 renter HHs)2003: 63 filings (8.87/100 renter HHs)2004: 97 filings (13.66/100 renter HHs)2005: 114 filings (19.39/100 renter HHs)2006: 111 filings (18.88/100 renter HHs)2007: 47 filings (7.99/100 renter HHs)2008: 103 filings (17.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 61 filings (10.37/100 renter HHs)2010: 102 filings (12.50/100 renter HHs)2011: 125 filings (15.72/100 renter HHs)2012: 105 filings (13.21/100 renter HHs)2013: 140 filings (17.61/100 renter HHs)2014: 110 filings (13.84/100 renter HHs)2015: 67 filings (8.43/100 renter HHs)2016: 46 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2017: 101 filings (10.20/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 40% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 629Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.76×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (1.04× baseline)2020-02-01: 11 filings (0.96× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-09-01: 14 filings (1.08× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-03-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 8 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.26× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 13 filings (0.93× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-09-01: 17 filings (1.31× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-12-01: 19 filings (2.24× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (0.96× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (0.35× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-04-01: 9 filings (0.72× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-07-01: 8 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (1.15× baseline)2023-10-01: 18 filings (1.64× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-01-01: 22 filings (1.91× baseline)2024-02-01: 12 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-04-01: 14 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (1.22× baseline)2024-06-01: 12 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 34 filings (2.43× baseline)2024-08-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2024-09-01: 16 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-12-01: 18 filings (2.12× baseline)2025-01-01: 18 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (0.78× baseline)2025-03-01: 16 filings (1.68× baseline)2025-04-01: 12 filings (0.96× baseline)2025-05-01: 20 filings (1.74× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-07-01: 16 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-12-01: 17 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hurst

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hurst, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.76x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113404

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113404?

Census tract 48439113404 in Hurst scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113404?

Median gross rent is $1,417/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113404?

10.3% of residents in tract 48439113404 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,871.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113404?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 98th, minority 54th, housing 93th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113404?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,539 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113404 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.56% of renter households, peaking at 17.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113404 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.76× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113404 compare to Hurst overall?

Tract 48439113404 scores 3.2/10, higher than the parent city of Hurst at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hurst; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hurst

Top eight tracts in Hurst ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related