Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Hurst Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48439113407 · Tarrant, TX · pop 6,786 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Hurst

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48439113407 (Hurst, Texas) comes in at 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #17,407 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 58% of renter households, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,242 a month against an average household income of $54,966 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 64% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 27% Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units1,985
Renter share63.5%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate20.4%
Median income$54,966

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Hurst
Very High
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#107 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
High
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#2,943 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,643 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hurst and the region

Centroid at 32.8150, -97.1586 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hurst scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hurst
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
20.4% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$1,242 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hurst
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hurst
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hurst
6.3

How Hurst compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hurst risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 113407Hurst: 2.22.2Hurstparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,876Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 11.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.0%Peak (2002)
  • 103Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391134072001: 140 filings (15.05/100 renter HHs)2002: 214 filings (23.01/100 renter HHs)2003: 125 filings (13.44/100 renter HHs)2004: 130 filings (13.98/100 renter HHs)2005: 130 filings (16.05/100 renter HHs)2006: 86 filings (10.62/100 renter HHs)2007: 52 filings (6.42/100 renter HHs)2008: 70 filings (8.64/100 renter HHs)2009: 57 filings (7.04/100 renter HHs)2010: 80 filings (7.56/100 renter HHs)2011: 104 filings (9.55/100 renter HHs)2012: 118 filings (10.84/100 renter HHs)2013: 115 filings (10.56/100 renter HHs)2014: 94 filings (8.63/100 renter HHs)2015: 141 filings (12.95/100 renter HHs)2016: 117 filings (12.57/100 renter HHs)2017: 103 filings (11.06/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 26% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 508Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.89×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 16 filings (2.46× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (0.93× baseline)2020-03-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-05-01: 7 filings (0.64× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 15 filings (2.73× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-06-01: 21 filings (2.21× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 10 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-09-01: 10 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-10-01: 22 filings (2.93× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (1.69× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2023-04-01: 10 filings (2.86× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (1.47× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-12-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-02-01: 16 filings (2.13× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-05-01: 13 filings (1.18× baseline)2024-06-01: 9 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 19 filings (1.46× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2025-03-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 11 filings (0.85× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hurst

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hurst, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.89x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,876 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 11.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.0% of renter households in 2002.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113407

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113407?

Census tract 48439113407 in Hurst scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113407?

Median gross rent is $1,242/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113407?

20.4% of residents in tract 48439113407 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,786.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113407?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 83th, minority 82th, housing 31th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113407?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,876 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113407 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.65% of renter households, peaking at 23.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113407 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.89× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113407 compare to Hurst overall?

Tract 48439113407 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Hurst at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hurst; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hurst

Top eight tracts in Hurst ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related