Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Spring Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Layton

Tract 49011126001 · Davis, UT · pop 5,386 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Spring Hollow in Layton anchors census tract 49011126001, which lands at 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 17th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 42% of renter households, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,330 a month while the average household earns $74,901 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 40% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 23% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,045
Renter share40.0%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$74,901

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 12 tracts In Layton
High
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#12 of 66 tracts In Davis
High
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#268 of 716 tracts In Utah
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Layton and the region

Centroid at 41.0680, -111.9726 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spring Hollow scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Layton
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,330 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Layton
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Layton
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Layton
4.9

How Spring Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spring Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 126001Layton: 2.12.1Laytonparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 182Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 5.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.2%Peak (2015)
  • 13Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111260012006: 33 filings (9.58/100 renter HHs)2009: 17 filings (4.94/100 renter HHs)2011: 19 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)2014: 34 filings (6.01/100 renter HHs)2015: 41 filings (7.24/100 renter HHs)2016: 25 filings (3.22/100 renter HHs)2018: 13 filings (1.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 61% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spring Hollow

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Layton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 182 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 5.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.2% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011126001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126001?

Census tract 49011126001 in the Spring Hollow neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011126001?

Median gross rent is $1,330/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126001?

10.1% of residents in tract 49011126001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,386.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 52th, minority 44th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 49011126001 considered part of Spring Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011126001 fall within Spring Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 182 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.15% of renter households, peaking at 7.2% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011126001 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011126001 compare to Layton overall?

Tract 49011126001 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Layton at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Layton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Layton

Top eight tracts in Layton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related