Skip to content
Hoytsville, Utah eviction risk overview
City brief · 800 residents

Hoytsville, UT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Summit County · Population 800

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

85th percentile, Utah.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.7 Now2.3
2.3 1.3 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.4 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.4 1993 · score 1.4 1994 · score 1.4 1995 · score 1.4 1996 · score 1.4 1997 · score 1.3 1998 · score 1.4 1999 · score 1.4 2000 · score 1.4 2001 · score 1.5 2002 · score 1.6 2003 · score 1.5 2004 · score 1.5 2005 · score 1.4 2006 · score 1.4 2007 · score 1.4 2008 · score 1.5 2009 · score 1.7 2010 · score 1.8 2011 · score 1.7 2012 · score 1.5 2013 · score 1.5 2014 · score 1.5 2015 · score 1.5 2016 · score 1.8 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.1 2021 · score 1.9 2022 · score 1.9 2023 · score 1.9 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 1.9 Economic 7.8 Supply 5.1 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 8.0 Housing 3.9 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +14.8% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    Utah legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    15.1% poverty · 9.7% unemp.
    7.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,229 average · 46.0% renters
    5.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    12.6% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    46.0% renters
    8.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hoytsville and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Hoytsville compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Summit County
Very High
#2 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 90th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 11 cities in Summit County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Utah
High
#60 of 333 cities
Rank in state, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#60 of 333 cities in Utah for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Hoytsville risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Hoytsville: 2.32.3HoytsvilleThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,229/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $886–$2,982 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 46.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 800 residents, 46.0% rent. 13% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 15.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (Dem margin +14.8% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 3.9, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.8. Supply constraint: 5.1. The numbers behind those: 15.1% poverty, 9.7% unemployment, 13% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Hoytsville sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Salt Lake City, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.9 Salt Lake City West Valley City, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.6 West Valley City West Jordan, UT · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.3 West Jordan Provo, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.2 Provo Orem, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 Orem Sandy, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Sandy Ogden, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7 Ogden Lehi, UT · 24d · ~$2.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.2 Lehi Layton, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.1 Layton South Jordan, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.1 South Jordan Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Hoytsville
Hoytsville · 26d · ~$1.9k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Hoytsville, UT

Landlording in Hoytsville, Utah, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Hoytsville is a city of 800 residents where 46.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 12.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,229/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Hoytsville eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Hoytsville closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Hoytsville's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Hoytsville runs $886 to $2,982 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $1,229/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8/10 in Hoytsville, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Utah, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Hoytsville: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Utah's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,982 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Hoytsville

Trap · 46.0%
46.0% renter share against 800 residents produces roughly 368 rental occupants in Hoytsville. Morgan County voted R 62.9% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the best way to handle a tenant who's always late but eventually pays?

Consistency is key. Apply late fees exactly as stated in your lease, every single time. Don't waive them. If they pay consistently late, consider serving a 3-day pay-or-quit notice even if they eventually pay, just to establish the seriousness. For repeat offenders, a 15-day no-cause notice might be an option if their lease is month-to-month or nearing its end, to get them out before it becomes a chronic problem.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Hoytsville without a lawyer?

Technically, yes, you can represent yourself. However, it's risky. Any small error in notice, filing, or court procedure can get your case dismissed, forcing you to start over and lose more rent. Given the low typical eviction cost range of $886, $2,982, hiring an attorney for a few hundred to a couple thousand dollars is a worthwhile investment to ensure it's done right and fast. It protects your larger asset.

Q3

Are there any rent control rules in Hoytsville or Utah?

No, there are no statewide rent control laws in Utah, and Hoytsville does not have any local ordinances either. This means you are generally free to set market rates and increase rent with proper notice (typically 15 days for month-to-month leases, or at lease renewal for fixed-term leases). For more, see our Utah rent control rules.

Q4

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to financial hardship?

Sympathy is fine, but your property is a business. Offer to work with them on a payment plan *before* you serve the 3-day notice, if you choose. But once the notice is served, stick to the process. You can suggest they look for rental assistance programs, but don't delay the eviction process based on promises. "Cash for keys" can be a good option here, it acknowledges their hardship while ensuring you get your property back.

Q5

Do I have to accept Section 8 or other housing vouchers in Hoytsville?

No, Utah does not have statewide source-of-income protection laws. This means you are not legally required to accept tenants solely based on their use of housing vouchers, as long as your screening criteria are applied consistently and do not discriminate against other protected classes. However, it's wise to consider all qualified applicants. Check our Utah tenant protections for more details.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Hoytsville in the 85th percentile of Utah cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.