Skip to content
Neilton, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 299 residents

Neilton, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Grays Harbor County · Population 299

In 2026
Risk score
6.4
ELEVATED

26th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now6.4
6.7 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.4 2002 · score 3.5 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.6 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.6 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 5.0 2020 · score 6.5 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.5 2023 · score 6.3 2024 · score 6.2 2025 · score 6.4 2026 · score 6.4

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.2 Regional 5.2 State 6.0 Economic 5.2 Supply 2.2 Rent Control 4.8 Eviction 5.8 Tenant 2.2 Housing 3.7 6.4 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +6.0% (2024)
    5.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    33.1% poverty · 7.2% unemp.
    5.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,141 average · 4.7% renters
    2.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    32.0% of income on rent
    4.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    168 days filing → judgment
    5.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    4.7% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Neilton and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Neilton compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Grays Harbor County
Low
#21 of 30 cities
Rank in county, 31st percentileLowHigh
#21 of 30 cities in Grays Harbor County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Low
#501 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 21st percentileLowHigh
#501 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Neilton risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Neilton: 6.46.4NeiltonThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.4
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 168d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,141/mo. A contested eviction takes 168 days and costs $8,093–$20,465 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 4.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 299 residents, 4.7% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 33.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.2 and 5.2 (GOP margin +6.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.8, housing court bias 3.7, rent-control risk 4.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.2. Supply constraint: 2.2. The numbers behind those: 33.1% poverty, 7.2% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Neilton sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.7 Spokane Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.2 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Spokane Valley Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Neilton
Neilton · 168d · ~$14.3k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Neilton, WA

Landlording in Neilton, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.4/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Neilton is a city of 299 residents where 4.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 32.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,141/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Neilton eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Neilton closes 168 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Neilton's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Neilton runs $8,093 to $20,465 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 168 days of typical timeline and $1,141/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Neilton, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Neilton: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $20,465 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Neilton

Trap · 6.6 POINTS
Grays Harbor County voted Republican by 6.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral statutory bias under HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just disappears? Can I change the locks?

No. In Washington, you cannot simply change the locks, even if you suspect abandonment. You must follow a specific legal process for abandonment, which usually involves sending a notice to the tenant's last known address and waiting a certain number of days. If you illegally lock out a tenant, you could face significant penalties. Consult an attorney for the proper abandonment procedure.

Q2

How much can I charge for late fees in Neilton?

Washington law doesn't specify a maximum late fee amount, but it must be "reasonable." What's reasonable often depends on the rent amount. A common practice is 5% of the monthly rent. However, you cannot charge a late fee until the rent is at least five days late. This must be clearly stated in your lease agreement.

Q3

Can I refuse to renew a lease without a reason?

Washington has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. This means you generally cannot refuse to renew a lease without a specific, legally recognized reason, even for a month-to-month tenancy. The specific reasons are outlined in RCW § 59.18. This is a significant protection for tenants in Neilton and across the state.

Q4

My tenant caused property damage. Can I deduct it from the security deposit?

Yes, you can deduct for damage beyond normal wear and tear. You must provide an itemized statement of deductions and return any remaining deposit within 21 days of the tenant vacating. Take clear photos or videos of the damage before and after the tenant moves out. Keep all receipts for repairs. Meticulous documentation is key to defending any deductions.

Q5

What does "source of income protection" mean for me?

It means you cannot deny an applicant solely because of their lawful source of income, such as Section 8 vouchers, Social Security, or disability payments. If an applicant meets all your other screening criteria (credit, background, rental history) and their income source is legitimate and sufficient, you cannot refuse to rent to them because of that source.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.4/10 places Neilton in the 26th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.