Skip to content
Lake Tapps, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 12,798 residents

Lake Tapps, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Pierce County · Population 12,798

In 2026
Risk score
6.5
ELEVATED

35th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average3.6 Now6.5
6.7 2.2 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.2 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.3 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.3 2011 · score 4.3 2012 · score 4.2 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.2 2015 · score 4.2 2016 · score 4.2 2017 · score 4.3 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 4.8 2020 · score 6.5 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.5 2023 · score 6.3 2024 · score 6.3 2025 · score 6.5 2026 · score 6.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 6.0 Economic 4.0 Supply 6.0 Rent Control 1.6 Eviction 5.9 Tenant 2.8 Housing 2.4 6.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.8% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    5.0% poverty · 2.9% unemp.
    4.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,091 average · 10.8% renters
    6.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    20.3% of income on rent
    1.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    153 days filing → judgment
    5.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    10.8% renters
    2.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake Tapps and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lake Tapps compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pierce County
Very Low
#58 of 60 cities
Rank in county, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#58 of 60 cities in Pierce County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Low
#448 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 30th percentileLowHigh
#448 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lake Tapps risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lake Tapps: 6.56.5Lake TappsThis cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 153d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,091/mo. A contested eviction takes 153 days and costs $7,519–$21,927 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 10.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 12,798 residents, 10.8% rent. 20% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (Dem margin +10.8% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.9, housing court bias 2.4, rent-control risk 1.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4. Supply constraint: 6. The numbers behind those: 5.0% poverty, 2.9% unemployment, 20% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lake Tapps sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond South Hill, WA · 159d · ~$14.2k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.9 South Hill Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Lake Tapps
Lake Tapps · 153d · ~$14.7k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lake Tapps, WA

Landlording in Lake Tapps, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lake Tapps is a city of 12,798 residents where 10.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 20.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,091/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lake Tapps eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lake Tapps closes 153 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lake Tapps's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lake Tapps runs $7,519 to $21,927 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 153 days of typical timeline and $2,091/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.8/10 in Lake Tapps, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lake Tapps: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $21,927 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lake Tapps

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Lake Tapps to neighboring cities in Pierce County via the grid below. The 4.4/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under HB 1236 + RCW 59.18. Pierce County 2020 presidential margin: D+11.2. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Washington statutory detail.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, county-level. Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 328 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 1.40× the historical baseline (above baseline). Past 12 months: 3,573 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 13,911.

  • 328Past month
  • 3,573Past 12 months
  • 1.40×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 10.6%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least 14 days notice. Filing fee: $250 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 206 filings (0.77× hist)2023-06-01: 238 filings (0.84× hist)2023-07-01: 275 filings (0.94× hist)2023-08-01: 301 filings (1.01× hist)2023-09-01: 251 filings (0.91× hist)2023-10-01: 306 filings (0.96× hist)2023-11-01: 288 filings (1.05× hist)2023-12-01: 269 filings (1.08× hist)2024-01-01: 273 filings (1.40× hist)2024-02-01: 289 filings (1.25× hist)2024-03-01: 301 filings (1.12× hist)2024-04-01: 265 filings (1.13× hist)2024-05-01: 328 filings (1.23× hist)2024-06-01: 329 filings (1.16× hist)2024-07-01: 310 filings (1.06× hist)2024-08-01: 293 filings (0.99× hist)2024-09-01: 300 filings (1.09× hist)2024-10-01: 332 filings (1.04× hist)2024-11-01: 262 filings (0.95× hist)2024-12-01: 231 filings (0.92× hist)2025-01-01: 332 filings (1.70× hist)2025-02-01: 284 filings (1.28× hist)2025-03-01: 325 filings (1.20× hist)2025-04-01: 247 filings (1.06× hist)2025-05-01: 294 filings (1.10× hist)2025-06-01: 268 filings (0.95× hist)2025-07-01: 319 filings (1.09× hist)2025-08-01: 291 filings (0.98× hist)2025-09-01: 241 filings (0.88× hist)2025-10-01: 289 filings (0.91× hist)2025-11-01: 237 filings (0.86× hist)2025-12-01: 351 filings (1.40× hist)2026-01-01: 353 filings (1.81× hist)2026-02-01: 274 filings (1.23× hist)2026-03-01: 328 filings (1.22× hist)2026-04-01: 328 filings (1.40× hist)
Filings climbed 12% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for being a nuisance in Lake Tapps?

Yes, but it falls under the "just cause" requirement. You'd typically need to issue a notice to cure or quit for lease violations (e.g., excessive noise, property damage) giving the tenant a chance to fix the issue. If they don't, then you can proceed with an unlawful detainer. Document every incident thoroughly.

Q2

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to a job loss?

While unfortunate, this doesn't automatically stop an eviction for non-payment in Washington. You still follow the 14-day pay-or-quit notice. You can choose to be flexible and work out a payment plan, but if you do, get it in writing. Otherwise, proceed with the eviction process as outlined to protect your property and income.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Lake Tapps?

Legally, no, you can represent yourself. Practically, yes, you absolutely should hire an attorney. Washington's eviction laws (RCW § 59.18) are complex and highly specific. Even minor procedural errors can get your case dismissed, costing you more time and money. It's an investment in getting the job done right.

Q4

Can I change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction in Washington and can lead to severe penalties, including fines and potentially owing the tenant damages. You must go through the formal court eviction process to legally remove a tenant. Wait for the sheriff to execute the writ of restitution.

Q5

What is "source of income" protection in Washington?

Source of income protection means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because their income comes from a lawful source other than a traditional job, such as Section 8 housing vouchers, Social Security, or disability payments. You must evaluate these applicants based on the same criteria as any other tenant, like credit history and rental references.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.5/10 places Lake Tapps in the 35th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.