Neighborhood · Ranked #19,870 of 84,120 nationally
Larchmont Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma
Tract 53053063502 ·
Pierce County, WA · pop 4,853 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 53053063502 sits in the Larchmont neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 4,853 and an eviction-risk score of 6.0/10 (Elevated tier). 79% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 35% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,749/month against a median household income of $80,394 — roughly 26% rent-to-income at the medians.
Risk score
6.0
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%Stable renters 7%Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$80,394
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
38th percentile
#6 of 9 tracts In Larchmont
Low
Within parent city
33th percentile
#34 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Low
Within county
71th percentile
#56 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Elevated
Within state
91th percentile
#167 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tacoma and the region
Centroid at 47.1751, -122.4517 · click any tract to drill in
Why Larchmont scores 6.0
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,749 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
How Larchmont compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
70%Socioeconomic
93%Household composition
83%Racial/ethnic minority
55%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
8%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
253Total filings over 11 yrs
3.73%Avg annual filing rate
4.9%Peak (2006)
18Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 — 2015
Filings dropped 38% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
209Total filings 2020-21
2.7Avg monthly (observed)
4.2Pre-pandemic baseline
0.64×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053063502?
Census tract 53053063502 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 6.0/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53053063502?
Median gross rent is $1,749/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53053063502?
6.9% of residents in tract 53053063502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,853.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53053063502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 93th, minority 83th, housing 55th.
Q5
Is tract 53053063502 considered part of Larchmont?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053063502 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053063502?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 253 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053063502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.73% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 53053063502 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.64× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply — likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 53053063502 compare to Tacoma overall?
Tract 53053063502 scores 6.0/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 53053063502 historically redlined?
Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma
Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.