Skip to content
Snohomish, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 10,239 residents

Snohomish, WA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Snohomish County · Population 10,239

In 2026
Risk score
7.1
HIGH

94th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.9 Now7.1
7.1 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.2 1993 · score 3.2 1994 · score 3.2 1995 · score 3.3 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.4 2001 · score 3.5 2002 · score 3.5 2003 · score 3.5 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.5 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.6 2008 · score 4.1 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.4 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.6 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 5.1 2019 · score 5.2 2020 · score 6.8 2021 · score 7.0 2022 · score 6.8 2023 · score 6.7 2024 · score 6.9 2025 · score 7.1 2026 · score 7.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 6.0 Economic 6.4 Supply 8.3 Rent Control 6.7 Eviction 5.8 Tenant 8.4 Housing 5.6 7.1 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    8.3% poverty · 8.1% unemp.
    6.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,654 average · 44.6% renters
    8.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.7% of income on rent
    6.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    157 days filing → judgment
    5.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    44.6% renters
    8.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Snohomish and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Snohomish compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
Very High
#7 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 90th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
High
#71 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 89th percentileLowHigh
#71 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Snohomish risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Snohomish: 7.17.1SnohomishThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.1
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.1/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 157d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,654/mo. A contested eviction takes 157 days and costs $7,491–$19,496 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 44.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 10,239 residents, 44.6% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.8, housing court bias 5.6, rent-control risk 6.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.4. Supply constraint: 8.3. The numbers behind those: 8.3% poverty, 8.1% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Snohomish sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Snohomish
Snohomish · 157d · ~$13.5k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Snohomish, WA

Landlording in Snohomish, Washington, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.1/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Snohomish is a city of 10,239 residents where 44.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,654/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Snohomish eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Snohomish closes 157 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Snohomish's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Snohomish runs $7,491 to $19,496 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 157 days of typical timeline and $1,654/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.4/10 in Snohomish, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Snohomish: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $19,496 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Snohomish

Trap · 5.6/10
For landlords, the 5.5/10 score is most actionable when combined with Snohomish County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 5.6/10. Use proactive screening and documented notices.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a tenant out in Snohomish?

The fastest way is almost always "cash for keys." If you offer a tenant a reasonable sum to vacate voluntarily and quickly, it bypasses the entire court process, saving you months and thousands in legal fees and lost rent. Get a signed agreement specifying terms and timeline.

Q2

Can I charge whatever I want for a security deposit in Snohomish?

No. In Washington, you are capped at collecting one month's rent as a security deposit. Any additional fees must be clearly outlined and non-refundable, but the deposit itself cannot exceed this limit. There are strict rules on how it's handled and returned.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Snohomish?

While not legally required, it's highly recommended. Washington's eviction laws are complex, and procedural errors can lead to significant delays and increased costs. Given the 157-day average timeline and high costs, an experienced attorney can save you money and headaches.

Q4

What if my tenant claims their income is from a protected source?

Washington has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot deny an applicant solely because their income comes from a program like Section 8 or SSDI. You must apply your screening criteria (credit, rental history, income-to-rent ratio) uniformly to all applicants, regardless of income source.

Q5

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Snohomish?

Washington does not have statewide rent control, but local jurisdictions can adopt it. Snohomish itself doesn't currently have rent control. However, there are typically requirements for advance notice for rent increases, usually 60 days for month-to-month tenancies. Always check local ordinances and our Washington rent control rules for the latest information.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.1/10 places Snohomish in the 94th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.