Skip to content
Woodman, Wisconsin eviction risk overview
City brief · 224 residents

Woodman, WI Eviction Risk: LOW

Crawford County · Population 224

In 2026
Risk score
3.4
LOW

99th percentile, Wisconsin.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.8 Now3.4
4.2 2.1 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.7 2004 · score 2.6 2005 · score 2.6 2006 · score 2.7 2007 · score 2.7 2008 · score 3.2 2009 · score 3.5 2010 · score 3.5 2011 · score 3.5 2012 · score 3.4 2013 · score 3.3 2014 · score 3.2 2015 · score 3.2 2016 · score 3.2 2017 · score 3.1 2018 · score 3.0 2019 · score 3.0 2020 · score 4.1 2021 · score 4.2 2022 · score 3.4 2023 · score 3.0 2024 · score 3.4 2025 · score 3.4 2026 · score 3.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.2 Regional 5.2 State 2.9 Economic 8.5 Supply 3.9 Rent Control 4.6 Eviction 2.4 Tenant 3.1 Housing 5.8 3.4 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +13.8% (2024)
    5.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Wisconsin legislature & governorship
    2.9
  4. Economic stress
    16.2% poverty · 57.5% unemp.
    8.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $625 average · 15.5% renters
    3.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.0% of income on rent
    4.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    46 days filing → judgment
    2.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    15.5% renters
    3.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Woodman and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Woodman compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Crawford County
Very High
#1 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 13 cities in Crawford County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Wisconsin
Very High
#27 of 803 cities
Rank in state, 97th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 803 cities in Wisconsin for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Woodman risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Woodman: 3.43.4WoodmanThis cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg in countyState: 3.13.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.4
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 46d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $625/mo. A contested eviction takes 46 days and costs $1,987–$5,076 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 15.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 224 residents, 15.5% rent. 30% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 16.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.2 and 5.2 (GOP margin +13.8% (2024)). State climate at 2.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.4, housing court bias 5.8, rent-control risk 4.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.5. Supply constraint: 3.9. The numbers behind those: 16.2% poverty, 57.5% unemployment, 30% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Woodman sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Milwaukee, WI · 49d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Milwaukee Madison, WI · 45d · ~$3.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.6 Madison Green Bay, WI · 51d · ~$3.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 3 Green Bay Kenosha, WI · 53d · ~$3.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Kenosha Racine, WI · 51d · ~$3.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.6 Racine Appleton, WI · 48d · ~$3.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 2.9 Appleton Waukesha, WI · 54d · ~$3.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Waukesha Eau Claire, WI · 47d · ~$3.3k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.9 Eau Claire Oshkosh, WI · 47d · ~$3.5k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.9 Oshkosh Janesville, WI · 46d · ~$3.7k all-in ($80/day) · score 3 Janesville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Woodman
Woodman · 46d · ~$3.5k all-in ($77/day) · score 3.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Woodman, WI

Landlording in Woodman, Wisconsin, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.4/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Woodman is a city of 224 residents where 15.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $625/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Woodman eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Woodman closes 46 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Woodman's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Woodman runs $1,987 to $5,076 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 46 days of typical timeline and $625/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.1/10 in Woodman, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Wisconsin, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Woodman: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Wisconsin's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $5,076 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Woodman

Trap · 15.5%
15.5% renter share against 224 residents produces roughly 35 rental occupants in Woodman. Crawford County voted R 7.7% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,980 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.90× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 25,794 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 145,103.

  • 1,980Past month
  • 25,794Past 12 months
  • 0.90×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 15.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least five days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $94.50 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 2,410 filings (1.01× hist)2023-06-01: 2,537 filings (1.03× hist)2023-07-01: 2,536 filings (0.99× hist)2023-08-01: 2,743 filings (1.04× hist)2023-09-01: 2,286 filings (1.07× hist)2023-10-01: 2,552 filings (1.07× hist)2023-11-01: 2,151 filings (1.13× hist)2023-12-01: 2,077 filings (1.16× hist)2024-01-01: 2,545 filings (1.00× hist)2024-02-01: 2,259 filings (1.07× hist)2024-03-01: 2,032 filings (0.97× hist)2024-04-01: 2,340 filings (1.06× hist)2024-05-01: 2,378 filings (0.99× hist)2024-06-01: 2,392 filings (0.97× hist)2024-07-01: 2,589 filings (1.01× hist)2024-08-01: 2,514 filings (0.96× hist)2024-09-01: 1,996 filings (0.93× hist)2024-10-01: 2,235 filings (0.93× hist)2024-11-01: 1,659 filings (0.87× hist)2024-12-01: 1,713 filings (0.95× hist)2025-01-01: 2,112 filings (0.83× hist)2025-02-01: 1,680 filings (0.81× hist)2025-03-01: 1,693 filings (0.81× hist)2025-04-01: 2,086 filings (0.95× hist)2025-05-01: 2,137 filings (0.89× hist)2025-06-01: 2,246 filings (0.91× hist)2025-07-01: 2,504 filings (0.98× hist)2025-08-01: 2,486 filings (0.95× hist)2025-09-01: 2,440 filings (1.14× hist)2025-10-01: 2,083 filings (0.87× hist)2025-11-01: 1,776 filings (0.93× hist)2025-12-01: 1,854 filings (1.03× hist)2026-01-01: 2,385 filings (0.93× hist)2026-02-01: 1,958 filings (0.94× hist)2026-03-01: 1,945 filings (0.93× hist)2026-04-01: 1,980 filings (0.90× hist)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just disappears?

If your tenant abandons the property and leaves personal belongings, you generally cannot just change the locks. Wisconsin law has specific procedures for handling abandoned property. You usually need to provide notice to the tenant at their last known address, giving them time to retrieve their items. If they don't, you can dispose of or sell the property. Consult a local attorney to ensure you follow the correct abandonment procedures to avoid liability.

Q2

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. Self-help evictions, like turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings, are illegal in Wisconsin. Doing so can lead to significant penalties, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. Always follow the proper legal eviction process through the courts.

Q3

How often can I raise the rent in Woodman?

Since there's no statewide rent control in Wisconsin, you can generally raise the rent as often as you like, provided you give proper notice. For month-to-month tenancies, a 28-day notice is typically required before the rent increase takes effect. For tenants on a fixed-term lease, you can only raise the rent after the lease term expires, and you'd need to offer a new lease with the increased rent.

Q4

What are the biggest mistakes landlords make during eviction?

The most common mistakes include: incorrect or improperly served notices, accepting partial rent payments after issuing a notice (which can invalidate it), engaging in self-help evictions (like changing locks), not documenting communication and issues, and delaying the filing process. Speed and accuracy are critical. Any misstep can significantly prolong the process and increase your costs.

Q5

Does Woodman have any special tenant protections?

Woodman, as a small municipality in Crawford County, primarily follows Wisconsin state landlord-tenant laws. There are no known unique local ordinances that add significant tenant protections beyond the state level, such as local rent control or just-cause eviction requirements. Always double-check with the local county clerk's office for any very specific local rules, though it's uncommon in such small communities.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.4/10 places Woodman in the 99th percentile of Wisconsin cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.