1 census tracts · pop 3,170 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10
· range 3–3
G maps to a single census tract in Greendale, WI, population 3,170. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3/10, placing it in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs 44% against 30.4% citywide, putting G 13.8% over its own city.
Pulling the other way is economic stress, at 1.2/10. Severe burden reaches 24%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.
Running cool is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.5/10. CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 5.2% of adults, against 14.2% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 11 evictions logged in this tract. The worst year on record was 2008, when filings touched 0.8% of renter households. SNAP participation is 6.9% of households versus 15.2% nationally.
The most recent observed rate, 0.2% in 2017, is well off that peak. At 22% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.
The closest comparables inside the same city are S and D. Rent takes 13% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
G vs GreendaleHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority23%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport37%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history in G
Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
11Total filings (sum)
0.42%Avg annual filing rate
0.8%Peak year (2008)
0.24%Latest filed (2017)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
4Total filings 2020-21
0.1Avg monthly observed
0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
1.11×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee, WI).
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in G
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
5.2%Housing insecurity
3.1%Utility shutoff threat
6.9%Food insecurity
6.9%SNAP enrollment
4.8%No health insurance
27.9%Any disability
Frequently asked
About G
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for G?
G scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does G compare to Greendale overall?
G scores 1.0 points lower than Greendale overall (4/10). Renters spend 44% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,321 vs $1,252.
Q3
What is the average rent in G?
Average gross rent in G is $1,321/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of G residents are renters?
22% of G households are renter-occupied (vs 33% in Greendale). The neighborhood has 3,170 residents.
Q5
Is G a high social-vulnerability area?
G sits in the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is G for landlords?
G carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Greendale as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of G?
G has 3,160 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (85.1%), Other / Multiracial (7.5%), Hispanic / Latino (5.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
