Skip to content
Lusk, Wyoming eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,311 residents

Lusk, WY Eviction Risk: LOW

Niobrara County · Population 1,311

In 2026
Risk score
2.6
LOW

70th percentile, Wyoming.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average2.9 Now2.6
3.9 2.3 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.6 1996 · score 3.6 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.2 2003 · score 3.1 2004 · score 3.0 2005 · score 3.0 2006 · score 2.9 2007 · score 2.9 2008 · score 2.9 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.8 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.6 2017 · score 2.6 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 3.5 2021 · score 3.9 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.6 2026 · score 2.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.2 Regional 2.2 State 1.3 Economic 7.6 Supply 4.9 Rent Control 6.1 Eviction 1.3 Tenant 8.2 Housing 7.1 2.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +81.0% (2024)
    2.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.2
  3. State political climate
    Wyoming legislature & governorship
    1.3
  4. Economic stress
    21.3% poverty · 5.7% unemp.
    7.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $587 average · 49.2% renters
    4.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    14.1% of income on rent
    6.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    21 days filing → judgment
    1.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    49.2% renters
    8.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lusk and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lusk compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Niobrara County
Very High
#1 of 5 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 cities in Niobrara County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Wyoming
Elevated
#72 of 204 cities
Rank in state, 65th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 204 cities in Wyoming for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lusk risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lusk: 2.62.6LuskThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 21d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $587/mo. A contested eviction takes 21 days and costs $666–$2,158 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 49.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,311 residents, 49.2% rent. 14% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 21.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.2 and 2.2 (GOP margin +81.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 6.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.6. Supply constraint: 4.9. The numbers behind those: 21.3% poverty, 5.7% unemployment, 14% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lusk sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lusk, WY

Landlording in Lusk, Wyoming, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lusk is a city of 1,311 residents where 49.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 14.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $587/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lusk eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lusk closes 21 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lusk's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lusk runs $666 to $2,158 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 21 days of typical timeline and $587/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.2/10 in Lusk, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Wyoming, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lusk: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Wyoming's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,158 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lusk

Trap · 21.3%
Local poverty rate is 21.3%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward moderate volume in Niobrara County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 6.1/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Lusk without going to court?

No. In Lusk, like the rest of Wyoming, you cannot legally evict a tenant by simply changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing their belongings. You must go through the formal court eviction process to legally regain possession of your property. Self-help evictions are illegal and can lead to significant penalties.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to pay rent after it's due in Lusk?

Your lease agreement should specify when rent is due and when it's considered late. However, before you can file for eviction due to non-payment, you must provide the tenant with a 3-day pay-or-quit notice. This means they have three full days to pay the overdue rent in full or vacate the premises. You can't issue this notice until the rent is actually late, as defined by your lease.

Q3

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the judge orders an eviction?

If a judge issues a Writ of Restitution and the tenant still won't leave, the next step is to coordinate with the Niobrara County Sheriff's office. The sheriff will physically remove the tenant from the property. You cannot do this yourself. It's important to wait for the sheriff to execute the writ to avoid any legal issues.

Q4

Are there rent control laws in Lusk, Wyoming?

No, there are no statewide rent control laws in Wyoming, and Lusk does not have any local rent control ordinances. This means you are generally free to set and increase rent as market conditions allow, provided you give proper notice as outlined in your lease agreement and state law. For more on this, see our Wyoming rent control rules.

Q5

Can I charge late fees on rent in Lusk?

Yes, you can charge late fees in Lusk, provided they are clearly stated in your lease agreement. Wyoming law does not set a specific cap on late fees, but they must be reasonable and reflect the actual damages you incur due to late payment. Excessive late fees could be challenged in court.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.6/10 places Lusk in the 70th percentile of Wyoming cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.