Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Alamar Eviction Risk: Lower , Avondale

Tract 04013082208 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 3,521 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 04013082208 runs through the Alamar neighborhood of Avondale. With 3,521 residents, it scores 5.3/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #41,155 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 20% of renter households, a modest level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,112 a month against an average household income of $74,847 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 9% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 7% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units968
Renter share9.0%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate11.4%
Median income$74,847

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Alamar
Moderate
Within parent city
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 20 tracts In Avondale
Elevated
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#428 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Elevated
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#934 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Avondale and the region

Centroid at 33.4006, -112.3295 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alamar scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Avondale
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
11.4% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$2,112 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Avondale
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Avondale
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Avondale
6.4

How Alamar compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alamar risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 082208Avondale: 2.62.6Avondaleparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 27Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 4.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.2%Peak (2005)
  • 8Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040130822082001: 3 filings (3.67/100 renter HHs)2002: 5 filings (6.12/100 renter HHs)2003: 7 filings (8.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (1.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 167% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alamar

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Avondale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Maricopa County average of 5.1 and above the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 27 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.2% of renter households in 2005.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013082208

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013082208?

Census tract 04013082208 in the Alamar neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013082208?

Median gross rent is $2,112/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013082208?

11.4% of residents in tract 04013082208 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,521.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013082208?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 72th, minority 90th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 04013082208 considered part of Alamar?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013082208 fall within Alamar (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013082208?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013082208 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.88% of renter households, peaking at 1.2% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013082208 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013082208 compare to Avondale overall?

Tract 04013082208 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Avondale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Avondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Avondale

Top eight tracts in Avondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related