Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Sanalina Eviction Risk: Lower , Surprise

Tract 04013061037 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 6,230 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013061037 in the Sanalina area of Surprise, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,230 residents. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 14% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,880
Renter share23.9%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$115,391

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Sanalina
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 29 tracts In Surprise
Very Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#614 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Surprise and the region

Centroid at 33.6022, -112.3851 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sanalina scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Surprise
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$2,121 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Surprise
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Surprise
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Surprise
2.0

How Sanalina compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sanalina risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 061037Surprise: 3.23.2Surpriseparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 20Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 350.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 34.4%Peak (2005)
  • 13Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040130610372001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 7 filings (667.33/100 renter HHs)2005: 13 filings (34.36/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sanalina. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sanalina

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 20 filings here across 2 tracked years. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally. Against Maricopa County at 46.0%, 42% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. Filings peaked in 2005 at 34.4% of renter households. In a typical year about 350.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.4/10.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent is $2,121, close to the Surprise average.

Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $115,391.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013061037

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013061037?

Census tract 04013061037 in the Sanalina neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013061037?

Median gross rent is $2,121/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013061037?

6.0% of residents in tract 04013061037 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,230.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013061037?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 31th, minority 56th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 04013061037 considered part of Sanalina?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013061037 fall within Sanalina (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013061037?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 20 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 04013061037 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 350.85% of renter households, peaking at 34.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013061037 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013061037 compare to Surprise overall?

Tract 04013061037 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Surprise at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Surprise eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Surprise

Top eight tracts in Surprise ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related