Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Tanuri Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004721 · Pima, AZ · pop 3,920 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tanuri Hills in Catalina Foothills is where census tract 04019004721 sits, home to 3,920 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 32% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,125 monthly, set against $86,326 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 52% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 36%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units2,259
Renter share52.4%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$86,326
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
32
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2769, -110.8607 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri Hills scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,125 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5
How Tanuri Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 94%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 561Total filings over 12 yrs
- 5.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.1%Peak (2007)
- 64Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tanuri Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 14.0%Frequent mental distress
- 29.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri Hills
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pima County average of 5.5 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 561 eviction filings here over 12 tracked years, with about 5.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.1% of renter households in 2007.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019004721
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004721?
Census tract 04019004721 in the Tanuri Hills neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04019004721?
Median gross rent is $1,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004721?
10.5% of residents in tract 04019004721 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,920.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004721?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 11th, minority 53th, housing 94th.
Q5
Is tract 04019004721 considered part of Tanuri Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004721 fall within Tanuri Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004721?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 561 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004721 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.84% of renter households, peaking at 9.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 04019004721 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 04019004721 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Tract 04019004721 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AZ
04019004723
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tanuri Hills
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
04019004079
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Catalina Foothills
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
1.9
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · AZ
04019004717
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Related