Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Tanuri Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills

Tract 04019004721 · Pima, AZ · pop 3,920 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

04019004721 is a census tract in the Tanuri Hills area of Catalina Foothills, AZ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.8% across Pima County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 36% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units2,259
Renter share52.4%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$86,326

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tanuri Hills
Very High
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#7 of 17 tracts In Catalina Foothills
Elevated
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#205 of 270 tracts In Pima
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.2769, -110.8607 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanuri Hills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,125 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5

How Tanuri Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanuri Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 004721Catalina Foothills: 3.43.4Catalina Foothillsparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 561Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 5.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.1%Peak (2007)
  • 64Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190047212004: 58 filings (8.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 42 filings (5.86/100 renter HHs)2006: 55 filings (7.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 65 filings (9.07/100 renter HHs)2008: 33 filings (4.60/100 renter HHs)2009: 46 filings (6.42/100 renter HHs)2010: 40 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2012: 35 filings (4.03/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2016: 63 filings (6.23/100 renter HHs)2017: 64 filings (6.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanuri Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanuri Hills

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.4/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,125, 20% below the Catalina Foothills average. Food insecurity runs 7.9% against 17.8% nationally.

It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. The filing record is not thin: 561 evictions over 12 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2007, when 9.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 5.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $86,326, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004721

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004721?

Census tract 04019004721 in the Tanuri Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004721?

Median gross rent is $1,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004721?

10.5% of residents in tract 04019004721 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,920.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004721?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 11th, minority 53th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 04019004721 considered part of Tanuri Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004721 fall within Tanuri Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004721?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 561 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004721 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.84% of renter households, peaking at 9.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04019004721 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04019004721 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?

Tract 04019004721 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills

Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related