Tanuri Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004722 · Pima, AZ · pop 2,552 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
04019004722 is a census tract in the Tanuri Hills area of Catalina Foothills, AZ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The voucher gap is 36.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2898, -110.8482 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri Hills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tanuri Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 37Total filings over 10 yrs
- 4.40%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.7%Peak (2007)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tanuri Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 3.4%Housing insecurity
- 2.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.3%Food insecurity
- 2.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.2%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 9.8%Frequent mental distress
- 30.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri Hills
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,868, 32% above the Catalina Foothills average.
On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.
Housing insecurity runs 3.4% against 14.2% nationally. Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 43.8% across Pima County.
It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. Court records carry 37 eviction filings across 10 observed years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
The worst year on record was 2007, when 11.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 04019004722
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004722?
What is the average rent in tract 04019004722?
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004722?
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004722?
Is tract 04019004722 considered part of Tanuri Hills?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004722?
What share of households in tract 04019004722 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 04019004722 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.