Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Tanuri Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills

Tract 04019004722 · Pima, AZ · pop 2,552 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

04019004722 is a census tract in the Tanuri Hills area of Catalina Foothills, AZ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The voucher gap is 36.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 5% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,280
Renter share9.1%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$94,367

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Tanuri Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 17 tracts In Catalina Foothills
Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#206 of 270 tracts In Pima
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.2898, -110.8482 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanuri Hills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,868 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5

How Tanuri Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanuri Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 004722Catalina Foothills: 3.43.4Catalina Foothillsparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 5

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 37Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 4.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.7%Peak (2007)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190047222004: 3 filings (2.90/100 renter HHs)2005: 6 filings (7.78/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (6.48/100 renter HHs)2007: 9 filings (11.67/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (3.89/100 renter HHs)2009: 5 filings (6.48/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 2 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.65/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.79/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanuri Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanuri Hills

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,868, 32% above the Catalina Foothills average.

On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

Housing insecurity runs 3.4% against 14.2% nationally. Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 43.8% across Pima County.

It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. Court records carry 37 eviction filings across 10 observed years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2007, when 11.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004722

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004722?

Census tract 04019004722 in the Tanuri Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004722?

Median gross rent is $1,868/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004722?

4.7% of residents in tract 04019004722 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,552.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004722?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 15th, minority 25th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 04019004722 considered part of Tanuri Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004722 fall within Tanuri Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004722?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 04019004722 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.40% of renter households, peaking at 11.7% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04019004722 struggle to pay rent?

About 3.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04019004722 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?

Tract 04019004722 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills

Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related