Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037143302 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,258 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06037143302 covers part of the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,258. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

8.4

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 27% Owners 44%

Tract context

Occupied units1,637

Renter share55.6%

SVI overall0.48

Poverty rate6.7%

Median income$115,875

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1522, -118.3866 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

6.7% poverty · this tract

1.7

Supply constraint

$2,153 rent vs county FMR

3.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Silver Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

48%Socioeconomic
26%Household composition
42%Racial/ethnic minority
64%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
90%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

9.0%Housing insecurity
4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
8.7%Food insecurity
7.8%SNAP enrollment
5.5%Transit barriers
4.2%No health insurance
15.4%Frequent mental distress
23.1%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,153, 11% above the Los Angeles average. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. 52% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $115,875.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037143302

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143302?

Census tract 06037143302 in the Silver Triangle neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037143302?

Median gross rent is $2,153/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143302?

6.7% of residents in tract 06037143302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,258.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 26th, minority 42th, housing 64th.

Is tract 06037143302 considered part of Silver Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037143302 fall within Silver Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037143302 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037143302 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037143302 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037143302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.