Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

College Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Claremont

Tract 06037401901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,823 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 6.4/10, tract 06037401901 in the College Park area of Claremont, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,823. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 64% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units94
Renter share91.5%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$86,429

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In College Park
Elevated
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 9 tracts In Claremont
High
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#2,096 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.1007, -117.7087 · click any tract to drill in

Why College Park scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,850 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How College Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
College Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 401901Claremont: 7.47.4Claremontparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within College Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in College Park

91% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 2/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

At $1,850 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Claremont commands. Food insecurity runs 10.7% against 17.8% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #16,032 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037401901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037401901?

Census tract 06037401901 in the College Park neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037401901?

Median gross rent is $1,850/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037401901?

2.3% of residents in tract 06037401901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,823.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037401901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 0th, minority 75th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 06037401901 considered part of College Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037401901 fall within College Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037401901 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037401901 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037401901 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037401901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related