McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sacramento
Tract 06067000100 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,051 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Tract 06067000100, home to 4,051 residents in the McKinley Village area of Sacramento, scores 6.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 89% of US census tracts.
About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,050 a month against an average household income of $116,974 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5778, -121.4326 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 4.3%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06067000100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000100?
What is the average rent in tract 06067000100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000100?
Is tract 06067000100 considered part of McKinley Village?
What share of households in tract 06067000100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067000100 compare to Sacramento overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.