Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally

McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067000300 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,528 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 06067000300 sits in the McKinley Village area of Sacramento eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. It is home to 3,528 residents. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 36% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 15% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,599
Renter share24.0%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate5.3%
Median income$137,903

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In McKinley Village
Very Low
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#121 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Very Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#241 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,120 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5774, -121.4547 · click any tract to drill in

Why McKinley Village scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.3% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,377 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How McKinley Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
McKinley Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.5This tracttract 0003007.9Sacramentoparent city7.1Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.3/10. At $2,377 a month, rents run 34% over what the rest of Sacramento commands.

Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

Food insecurity runs 6.5% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 7.0% against 14.2% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 82nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067000300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000300?

Census tract 06067000300 in the McKinley Village neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067000300?

Median gross rent is $2,377/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000300?

5.3% of residents in tract 06067000300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,528.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 9th, minority 38th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 06067000300 considered part of McKinley Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067000300 fall within McKinley Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067000300 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067000300 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067000300 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067000300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related