McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sacramento
Tract 06067000300 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,528 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Eviction risk in McKinley Village in Sacramento centers on tract 06067000300, which scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,528 residents. It lands near the 81st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,377 a month while the average household earns $137,903 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5774, -121.4547 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 24%Grade B
- 58%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.5%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 4.2%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06067000300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000300?
What is the average rent in tract 06067000300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000300?
Is tract 06067000300 considered part of McKinley Village?
What share of households in tract 06067000300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067000300 compare to Sacramento overall?
Was tract 06067000300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.