Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Chaddsford Eviction Risk: Lower , Aurora

Tract 08005081400 · Arapahoe County, CO · pop 4,590 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.6/10 for census tract 08005081400 reflects conditions in the Chaddsford area of Aurora, Colorado. That is riskier than about 89% of US census tracts.

About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,206 a month against an average household income of $73,112 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. About 48% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 17% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units2,213
Renter share48.1%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate13.7%
Median income$73,112

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Chaddsford
Elevated
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 90 tracts In Aurora
Elevated
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#31 of 161 tracts In Arapahoe County
High
Within state
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#477 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Aurora and the region

Centroid at 39.6754, -104.8194 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chaddsford scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Aurora
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
13.7% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$2,206 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Aurora
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Aurora
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Aurora
5.0

How Chaddsford compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chaddsford risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 081400Aurora: 5.45.4Auroraparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 80Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2016)
  • 10Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 080050814002010: 18 filings (5.41/100 renter HHs)2011: 15 filings (3.77/100 renter HHs)2012: 17 filings (4.27/100 renter HHs)2016: 20 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2017: 10 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 44% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chaddsford. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chaddsford

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Aurora eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Arapahoe County average of 6.3 and above the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 80 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.4% of renter households in 2016.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 08005081400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08005081400?

Census tract 08005081400 in the Chaddsford neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08005081400?

Median gross rent is $2,206/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08005081400?

13.7% of residents in tract 08005081400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,590.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08005081400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 74th, minority 62th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 08005081400 considered part of Chaddsford?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08005081400 fall within Chaddsford (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08005081400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 80 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 08005081400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.99% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 08005081400 compare to Aurora overall?

Tract 08005081400 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Aurora at 5.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Aurora eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Aurora

Top eight tracts in Aurora ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related