Skip to content
Rangely, Colorado eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,466 residents

Rangely, CO Eviction Risk: LOW

Rio Blanco County · Population 2,466

In 2026
Risk score
3.9
LOW

18th percentile, Colorado.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.2 Now3.9
4.6 1.5 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.6 1995 · score 1.6 1996 · score 1.6 1997 · score 1.6 1998 · score 1.6 1999 · score 1.6 2000 · score 1.7 2001 · score 1.8 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 2.0 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 4.4 2021 · score 4.6 2022 · score 3.6 2023 · score 3.3 2024 · score 4.0 2025 · score 3.9 2026 · score 3.9

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.5 Regional 2.5 State 4.7 Economic 6.9 Supply 4.0 Rent Control 2.8 Eviction 4.2 Tenant 4.6 Housing 4.2 3.9 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +63.7% (2024)
    2.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.5
  3. State political climate
    Colorado legislature & governorship
    4.7
  4. Economic stress
    11.0% poverty · 7.8% unemp.
    6.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $770 average · 26.0% renters
    4.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    23.8% of income on rent
    2.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    92 days filing → judgment
    4.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    26.0% renters
    4.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rangely and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Rangely compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Rio Blanco County
Very High
#1 of 2 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 cities in Rio Blanco County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Colorado
Very Low
#413 of 479 cities
Rank in state, 14th percentileLowHigh
#413 of 479 cities in Colorado for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Rangely risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Rangely: 3.93.9RangelyThis cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg in countyState: 4.84.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.9
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 92d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $770/mo. A contested eviction takes 92 days and costs $4,580–$10,883 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 26.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,466 residents, 26.0% rent. 24% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.5 and 2.5 (GOP margin +63.7% (2024)). State climate at 4.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.2, housing court bias 4.2, rent-control risk 2.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.9. Supply constraint: 4. The numbers behind those: 11.0% poverty, 7.8% unemployment, 24% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Rangely sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Denver, CO · 98d · ~$8.6k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.7 Denver Colorado Springs, CO · 106d · ~$8.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.4 Colorado Springs Aurora, CO · 94d · ~$9.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 5.4 Aurora Fort Collins, CO · 106d · ~$9.0k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.4 Fort Collins Lakewood, CO · 91d · ~$8.7k all-in ($96/day) · score 5.2 Lakewood Thornton, CO · 98d · ~$7.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 4.5 Thornton Arvada, CO · 109d · ~$8.2k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.5 Arvada Westminster, CO · 99d · ~$7.3k all-in ($74/day) · score 4.4 Westminster Pueblo, CO · 91d · ~$8.8k all-in ($97/day) · score 5.2 Pueblo Greeley, CO · 105d · ~$8.0k all-in ($76/day) · score 4.6 Greeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Rangely
Rangely · 92d · ~$7.7k all-in ($84/day) · score 3.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Rangely, CO

Landlording in Rangely, Colorado, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.9/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Rangely is a city of 2,466 residents where 26.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 23.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $770/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Rangely eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Rangely closes 92 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Rangely's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Rangely runs $4,580 to $10,883 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 92 days of typical timeline and $770/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.6/10 in Rangely, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Colorado, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Rangely: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Colorado's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $10,883 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Rangely

Trap · 4.2/10
For landlords, the 3.4/10 score is most actionable when combined with Rio Blanco County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 4.2/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Rangely for a minor lease violation?

Yes, if the lease violation is material. For example, unauthorized pets or excessive noise that violates lease terms. You'd typically issue a 10-day notice to cure or quit. If they don't fix it within 10 days, you can proceed with eviction. Make sure your lease clearly defines what constitutes a violation.

Q2

What if my tenant claims they can't pay rent due to financial hardship?

While you can sympathize, financial hardship is generally not a legal defense against eviction for non-payment of rent in Colorado. You are entitled to receive rent. You can choose to work out a payment plan, but you are not legally obligated to. If you do, get it in writing. Otherwise, follow the 10-day pay-or-quit notice procedure.

Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Rangely?

You are not legally required to have an attorney, but it's highly recommended, especially if this is your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting the eviction. Landlord-tenant law has strict procedural rules. One mistake can delay the process or even get your case dismissed, costing you more time and money. For more on the state, check out the Colorado eviction risk overview or Rio Blanco County eviction guide.

Q4

Are there any rent control laws in Rangely or Colorado?

No, there are no statewide rent control laws in Colorado. Rangely does not have any local rent control ordinances either. This means you can generally set your own rent prices and increase them with proper notice, usually 30 days for month-to-month tenants. Stay informed on potential changes via the Colorado rent control rules page.

Q5

What are "source of income" protections in Colorado?

Colorado law prohibits landlords from discriminating against tenants based on their source of income. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher (like Section 8), disability benefits, or other lawful forms of income to pay rent. You can still screen for other factors like credit history, rental history, and criminal background, as long as your criteria are applied consistently to all applicants. More on this is available at Colorado tenant protections.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.9/10 places Rangely in the 18th percentile of Colorado cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.