Skip to content
Oakland City, Indiana eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,262 residents

Oakland City, IN Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Gibson County · Population 2,262

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

70th percentile, Indiana.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.2 Now2.3
3.1 1.5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.0 2002 · score 2.1 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.8 2009 · score 3.1 2010 · score 3.1 2011 · score 3.1 2012 · score 2.9 2013 · score 2.9 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.6 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.0 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.1 Regional 3.1 State 2.0 Economic 6.3 Supply 2.4 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.8 Tenant 2.2 Housing 1.7 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +51.4% (2024)
    3.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.1
  3. State political climate
    Indiana legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    8.6% poverty · 3.6% unemp.
    6.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $880 average · 40.0% renters
    2.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.3% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    37 days filing → judgment
    1.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    40.0% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland City and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Oakland City compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Gibson County
Very High
#2 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 90th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 11 cities in Gibson County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Indiana
Elevated
#358 of 971 cities
Rank in state, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#358 of 971 cities in Indiana for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Oakland City risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Oakland City: 2.32.3Oakland CityThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.42.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 37d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $880/mo. A contested eviction takes 37 days and costs $1,253–$3,025 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 40.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,262 residents, 40.0% rent. 26% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.1 and 3.1 (GOP margin +51.4% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.8, housing court bias 1.7, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.3. Supply constraint: 2.4. The numbers behind those: 8.6% poverty, 3.6% unemployment, 26% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Oakland City sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Evansville, IN · 37d · ~$2.5k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.3 Evansville Indianapolis, IN · 37d · ~$2.4k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.7 Indianapolis Fort Wayne, IN · 40d · ~$2.1k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.2 Fort Wayne South Bend, IN · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.6 South Bend Fishers, IN · 39d · ~$2.4k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Fishers Carmel, IN · 41d · ~$2.3k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Carmel Bloomington, IN · 35d · ~$2.4k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.8 Bloomington Hammond, IN · 41d · ~$2.5k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.7 Hammond Noblesville, IN · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.3 Noblesville Lafayette, IN · 41d · ~$2.4k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.4 Lafayette Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Oakland City
Oakland City · 37d · ~$2.1k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Oakland City, IN

Landlording in Oakland City, Indiana, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Oakland City is a city of 2,262 residents where 40.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $880/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Oakland City eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Oakland City closes 37 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Oakland City's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Oakland City runs $1,253 to $3,025 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 37 days of typical timeline and $880/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Oakland City, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Indiana, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Oakland City: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Indiana's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,025 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Oakland City

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Oakland City to neighboring cities in Pike County via the grid below. The 2.5/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under IC 32-31. Pike County 2020 presidential margin: R+52.7. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Indiana statutory detail.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 5,536 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.95× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 71,124 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 388,307.

  • 5,536Past month
  • 71,124Past 12 months
  • 0.95×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 17.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least ten days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: minimum filing fee of $87 (depending on the filing method).
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 6,535 filings (1.01× hist)2023-06-01: 6,849 filings (1.05× hist)2023-07-01: 6,392 filings (0.97× hist)2023-08-01: 6,893 filings (1.01× hist)2023-09-01: 6,053 filings (0.97× hist)2023-10-01: 6,377 filings (0.99× hist)2023-11-01: 5,473 filings (0.98× hist)2023-12-01: 5,072 filings (0.95× hist)2024-01-01: 6,488 filings (0.95× hist)2024-02-01: 5,546 filings (0.97× hist)2024-03-01: 4,994 filings (0.95× hist)2024-04-01: 5,732 filings (0.98× hist)2024-05-01: 6,186 filings (0.95× hist)2024-06-01: 5,971 filings (0.92× hist)2024-07-01: 6,556 filings (0.99× hist)2024-08-01: 6,405 filings (0.94× hist)2024-09-01: 5,989 filings (0.96× hist)2024-10-01: 6,334 filings (0.98× hist)2024-11-01: 5,515 filings (0.99× hist)2024-12-01: 5,529 filings (1.03× hist)2025-01-01: 6,682 filings (0.98× hist)2025-02-01: 5,583 filings (1.00× hist)2025-03-01: 4,985 filings (0.95× hist)2025-04-01: 5,499 filings (0.94× hist)2025-05-01: 5,854 filings (0.90× hist)2025-06-01: 6,312 filings (0.97× hist)2025-07-01: 6,736 filings (1.02× hist)2025-08-01: 6,317 filings (0.92× hist)2025-09-01: 6,149 filings (0.99× hist)2025-10-01: 6,313 filings (0.98× hist)2025-11-01: 5,141 filings (0.93× hist)2025-12-01: 5,602 filings (1.05× hist)2026-01-01: 6,368 filings (0.93× hist)2026-02-01: 5,712 filings (1.02× hist)2026-03-01: 5,084 filings (0.97× hist)2026-04-01: 5,536 filings (0.95× hist)
Filings dropped 5% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the shortest time I can evict a tenant in Oakland City for non-payment?

The absolute shortest is roughly 37 days. This includes your 10-day notice period and the average court processing time. However, this assumes no delays, immediate court action, and a tenant who doesn't fight the eviction. It's an average, not a guarantee.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant without a reason in Oakland City, IN?

If you have a month-to-month lease, yes, you can terminate the tenancy without cause by providing a 30-day notice. If you have a fixed-term lease, you generally need a reason (like a lease violation or non-payment) to evict before the lease term ends, unless the lease specifically allows for early termination without cause.

Q3

Is there a limit on how much I can charge for a security deposit?

No, Indiana law does not set a statutory cap on security deposits. While you can charge what you deem necessary, it's common practice to charge one to two months' rent. Be reasonable, as an excessive deposit might deter good tenants.

Q4

What happens if I don't return the security deposit on time?

If you don't return the security deposit or provide an itemized list of deductions within 45 days of the tenant vacating, you could be liable for double the amount wrongfully withheld, plus the tenant's attorney fees and court costs. It's a costly mistake, so mark your calendar.

Q5

Do I need an attorney to evict a tenant in Oakland City?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially if it's your first eviction or if the tenant contests the eviction. A lawyer ensures you follow all legal procedures correctly, minimizing delays and costly errors. Given the typical cost range, an attorney can be a wise investment.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Oakland City in the 70th percentile of Indiana cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.