Skip to content
Moorland, Kentucky eviction risk overview
City brief · 479 residents

Moorland, KY Eviction Risk: LOW

Jefferson County · Population 479

In 2026
Risk score
2.6
LOW

82th percentile, Kentucky.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average2.8 Now2.6
3.6 2.2 1976 · score 3.2 1977 · score 3.2 1978 · score 3.2 1979 · score 3.3 1980 · score 3.4 1981 · score 3.4 1982 · score 3.4 1983 · score 3.3 1984 · score 2.8 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.7 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.0 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 2.9 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 2.7 2005 · score 2.7 2006 · score 2.6 2007 · score 2.5 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.5 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.2 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 3.4 2021 · score 3.6 2022 · score 2.8 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.7 2026 · score 2.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 2.1 Economic 6.2 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 6.2 Eviction 1.7 Tenant 7.0 Housing 5.1 2.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +16.6% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    Kentucky legislature & governorship
    2.1
  4. Economic stress
    7.0% poverty · 8.5% unemp.
    6.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,508 average · 31.5% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.6% of income on rent
    6.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    33 days filing → judgment
    1.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    31.5% renters
    7.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Moorland and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Moorland compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Jefferson County
High
#14 of 81 cities
Rank in county, 84th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 81 cities in Jefferson County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kentucky
High
#139 of 553 cities
Rank in state, 75th percentileLowHigh
#139 of 553 cities in Kentucky for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Moorland risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Moorland: 2.62.6MoorlandThis cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.52.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 33d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,508/mo. A contested eviction takes 33 days and costs $1,259–$2,869 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 31.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 479 residents, 31.5% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 7.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +16.6% (2024)). State climate at 2.1, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.1
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.1/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.7, housing court bias 5.1, rent-control risk 6.2. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.2. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 7.0% poverty, 8.5% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Moorland sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Louisville, KY · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.4 Louisville Louisville, KY · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($64/day) · score 3.2 Louisville Lexington-Fayette urban county, KY · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.4 Lexington-Fayette urban county Bowling Green, KY · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.4 Bowling Green Owensboro, KY · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.3 Owensboro Indianapolis, IN · 37d · ~$2.4k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.7 Indianapolis Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.4 Dayton Evansville, IN · 37d · ~$2.5k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.3 Evansville Fishers, IN · 39d · ~$2.4k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Fishers Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Moorland
Moorland · 33d · ~$2.1k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Moorland, KY

Landlording in Moorland, Kentucky, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Moorland is a city of 479 residents where 31.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,508/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Moorland eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Moorland closes 33 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Moorland's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Moorland runs $1,259 to $2,869 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 33 days of typical timeline and $1,508/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7/10 in Moorland, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kentucky, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Moorland: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kentucky's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,869 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Moorland

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Moorland to neighboring cities in Jefferson County via the grid below. The 5.9/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under KRS 383 URLTA opt-in. Jefferson County 2020 presidential margin: D+20.1. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Kentucky statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue for non-payment?

Kentucky law generally requires tenants to pay rent even if there are maintenance issues, though they can send a written notice to you about repairs. If you don't fix it, they might have a right to sue you or withhold rent in escrow. However, they can't just stop paying rent and use that as an eviction defense unless they followed specific legal steps. Address maintenance promptly to avoid this becoming an issue.

Q2

Can I really use "cash for keys" in Moorland?

Yes, "cash for keys" is a legal and often effective strategy in Kentucky. It's a voluntary agreement where you offer a tenant money to vacate the property by a certain date, leaving it in good condition. It avoids the formal eviction process, saving you time, court costs, and potential damage to the unit. Always get the agreement in writing.

Q3

Is there rent control in Moorland, KY?

No, there is no rent control in Moorland or anywhere else in Kentucky. The state has preempted local governments from enacting rent control measures. Our rent-control-risk sub-score for Moorland is 6.2, which indicates a moderate underlying risk for future changes, but currently, you set your own rent. Keep an eye on Kentucky rent control rules for any legislative changes.

Q4

How long does it take for the sheriff to remove a tenant after a court order?

Once you have a judgment for possession and a writ of possession, the timeline for the sheriff to perform a lockout can vary, usually a few days to a week. It depends on the sheriff's department's schedule and workload in Jefferson County. Don't plan to change locks immediately after court; wait for the official sheriff-supervised lockout. For more on this, see our Jefferson County eviction guide.

Q5

What if the tenant leaves personal property behind after an eviction?

Kentucky law has specific rules for handling abandoned property. You generally need to store it for a certain period and notify the tenant before you can dispose of it or sell it. Failing to follow these rules can expose you to liability. Document everything and consult with an attorney if you're unsure about the process.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.6/10 places Moorland in the 82nd percentile of Kentucky cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.