Skip to content
Thomaston, Maine eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,055 residents

Thomaston, ME Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Knox County · Population 2,055

In 2026
Risk score
4.6
MODERATE

68th percentile, Maine.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.7 Average3.8 Now4.6
5.8 2.7 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 3.0 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 2.9 1980 · score 3.0 1981 · score 3.0 1982 · score 3.0 1983 · score 3.0 1984 · score 2.8 1985 · score 2.8 1986 · score 2.8 1987 · score 2.7 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 4.0 1997 · score 4.0 1998 · score 4.0 1999 · score 4.0 2000 · score 4.0 2001 · score 4.0 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 3.9 2004 · score 3.8 2005 · score 3.8 2006 · score 3.8 2007 · score 3.8 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.4 2016 · score 4.4 2017 · score 4.3 2018 · score 4.3 2019 · score 4.2 2020 · score 5.5 2021 · score 5.8 2022 · score 4.8 2023 · score 4.5 2024 · score 4.6 2025 · score 4.6 2026 · score 4.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 4.0 Economic 5.7 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 8.4 Eviction 4.0 Tenant 7.0 Housing 7.1 4.6 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +18.6% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    Maine legislature & governorship
    4.0
  4. Economic stress
    11.5% poverty · 3.8% unemp.
    5.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,119 average · 29.7% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    35.9% of income on rent
    8.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    77 days filing → judgment
    4.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    29.7% renters
    7.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Thomaston and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Thomaston compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Knox County
Very Low
#3 of 3 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 cities in Knox County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Maine
Elevated
#64 of 155 cities
Rank in state, 59th percentileLowHigh
#64 of 155 cities in Maine for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Thomaston risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Thomaston: 4.64.6ThomastonThis cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.6
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 77d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,119/mo. A contested eviction takes 77 days and costs $3,285–$6,574 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 29.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,055 residents, 29.7% rent. 36% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +18.6% (2024)). State climate at 4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 8.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.7. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 11.5% poverty, 3.8% unemployment, 36% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Thomaston sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Portland, ME · 77d · ~$5.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 5.9 Portland Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Manchester, NH · 57d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.7 Manchester Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Lynn Nashua, NH · 62d · ~$4.7k all-in ($76/day) · score 3.8 Nashua Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Lawrence Haverhill, MA · 186d · ~$22.5k all-in ($121/day) · score 5.9 Haverhill Malden, MA · 214d · ~$19.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.1 Malden Revere, MA · 203d · ~$18.5k all-in ($91/day) · score 6.2 Revere Peabody, MA · 184d · ~$20.8k all-in ($113/day) · score 5.8 Peabody Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Thomaston
Thomaston · 77d · ~$4.9k all-in ($64/day) · score 4.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Thomaston, ME

Landlording in Thomaston, Maine, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.6/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Thomaston is a city of 2,055 residents where 29.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 35.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,119/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Thomaston eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Thomaston closes 77 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Thomaston's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Thomaston runs $3,285 to $6,574 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 77 days of typical timeline and $1,119/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7/10 in Thomaston, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Maine, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Thomaston: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Maine's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $6,574 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Thomaston

Trap · 8.4/10
The 5/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Thomaston's rent-control-risk sub-score is 8.4/10, driven by demographic and political pressure for tenant relief.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Thomaston without going to court?

No. You absolutely cannot physically remove a tenant, change locks, or shut off utilities without a court order. That's an illegal eviction (self-help eviction) and can lead to significant penalties for you. Even if your tenant is clearly in violation, you must follow the judicial eviction process.
Q2

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue after I serve an eviction notice?

This is a common tactic. If the maintenance issue is legitimate and affects habitability, you have a legal obligation to address it. However, if it's a minor issue or clearly a delaying tactic, it doesn't automatically stop an eviction for non-payment. Document everything: when the issue was reported, when you responded, and what actions were taken. Don't let a sudden complaint derail a legitimate eviction.
Q3

Is rent control a risk in Thomaston?

Maine currently has no statewide rent control. Our data shows a rent-control-risk sub-score of 8.4/10 for Thomaston, which is relatively high. While there are no local ordinances currently, this score indicates a higher potential for such measures to be introduced in the future, particularly at the state level. Stay informed on Maine rent control rules as they can change.
Q4

Do I have to accept Section 8 or other housing vouchers?

Yes, Maine has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to an applicant simply because they pay their rent with a housing voucher, like Section 8. You can still screen these applicants using the same criteria (credit, background, references) as any other tenant, but you cannot discriminate based on the source of their income. Learn more about Maine tenant protections.
Q5

How do I handle a tenant who leaves personal belongings behind after an eviction?

Maine law has specific rules for abandoned property. You generally need to store the property for a certain period (often 7-10 days after the eviction) and provide notice to the tenant before you can dispose of or sell it. Document everything, including photos of the items. Consult legal counsel or review state statutes regarding abandoned property to ensure you comply.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.6/10 places Thomaston in the 68th percentile of Maine cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.